Computer simulation of smoothing during computer-controlled optical polishing
Abstract
Itek has developed computer-controlled optical surfacing (CCOS) for the fabrication of aspheric optical surfaces. The smoothing process plays a key role in all CCOS operations. A computer simulation algorithm was created to provide information on the CCOS smoothing process. The reliability of the algorithm was confirmed with several verification cases. The effect of pertinent tool, lap, and error parameters on smoothing was determined from a series of simulations. In addition, the smoothing algorithm was applied to an operational case to provide real-world credibility. The smoothing simulation algorithm appears to be accurate and useful. The parametric study results are available and the algorithm can be applied to specific cases for guidance in proper CCOS parameter selection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing models on the removal of MSF ripples are based on concepts similar to the workpiece-tool mismatch mechanism described above.
“Existing models on the removal of MSF ripples are based on concepts similar to the workpiece-tool mismatch mechanism described above [26-29].”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing
Suratwala, T., Tham, G., Steele, R., Wong, L., Menapace, J., Ray, N., & Bauman, B. (2023) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.482739 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jones, R. A.
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Robert A.
- Venue
- Applied Optics
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1162
- ISSN
- 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4522
- OpenAlex
- W2047958058
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Optics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced optical system design
- Keywords
- computer simulation algorithm
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review