Cited by 7Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationRemote-Sensing Image Classification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Residual grounding transformer network for terrain recognition on the lunar surface

Qiu, Linwei, Li, Haichao, Li, Zhi, Wang, Cheng·2021·Applied Optics

Abstract

It is of paramount importance for a rover running on an extraterrestrial body surface to recognize the dangerous zones autonomously. This automation is inevitable due to the communication delay. However, as far as we know, there are few annotated terrain recognition datasets for extraterrestrial bodies. Furthermore, the lack of datasets hinders the training and evaluation of recognition algorithms. Therefore, we first built the Chang’e 3 terrain recognition (CE3TR) dataset to address terrain recognition and semantic segmentation problems on the lunar surface. The moon is one of the nearest celestial bodies to the earth; our work is geared towards extraterrestrial bodies. The images of our dataset are captured by the Yutu moon rover, which can retain the real illumination condition and terrain environment on the moon. A residual grounding transformer network (RGTNet) is also proposed to find out unsafe areas like rocks and craters. The residual grounding transformer is introduced to facilitate cross-scale interactions of different level features. A local binary pattern feature fusion module is another notable part of the RGTNet, which contributes to extracting the boundaries of different obstacles. We also present the ability of new loss, called smooth intersection over union loss, to mitigate overfitting. To evaluate RGTNet, we have conducted extensive experiments on our CE3TR dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that our model can recognize risky terrain readily and outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ao.428232

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Wong, 2017, Adaptive and intelligent navigation of autonomous planetary rovers-a survey, 237
  2. Bai, 2019, Aircraft Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 91, 961, 10.1108/AEAT-09-2017-0200 · DOI
  3. Halatci, 2007, Terrain classification and classifier fusion for planetary exploration rovers, 1
  4. Sun, 2015, China J. Nanjing Univ. Astronaut. Aeronaut., 47, 785, 10.16356/j.1005-2615.2015.06.001 · DOI
  5. Maimone, 2007, Overview of the Mars exploration rovers’ autonomous mobility and vision capabilities, 237
  6. Grotzinger, 2012, Space Sci. Rev., 170, 5, 10.1007/s11214-012-9892-2 · DOI
  7. Gor, 2001, Autonomous rock detection for Mars terrain, AIAA-01-4597
  8. Hadsell, 2008, Deep belief net learning in a long-range vision system for autonomous off-road driving, 628
  9. Hadsell, 2009, J. Field Robot., 26, 120, 10.1002/rob.20276 · DOI
  10. Weiss, 2006, Vibration-based terrain classification using support vector machines, 4429
  11. Yang, 2014, Robot. Auton. Syst., 62, 151, 10.1016/j.robot.2013.11.003 · DOI
  12. Wilcox, 1994, Non-geometric hazard detection for a Mars microrover, 675
  13. Soundrapandian, 2010, Traversability assessment of terrain for autonomous robot navigation, 1286
  14. Krizhevsky, 2012, ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, 1097
  15. Khanafer, 2020, IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag., 23, 10, 10.1109/MIM.2020.9200875 · DOI
  16. Simpson, 1982, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 30, 438, 10.1109/TAP.1982.1142803 · DOI
  17. Chen, 2018, Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation, 801
  18. Ojala, 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 24, 971, 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017623 · DOI · Paper page
  19. He, 2016, Deep residual learning for image recognition, 770
  20. Zhang, 2020, Feature pyramid transformer, 323
  21. Szegedy, 2016, Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision, 2818
  22. Filitchkin, 2012, Feature-based terrain classification for littledog, 1387
  23. Lyasheva, 2014, Russ. Aeronaut., 57, 303, 10.3103/S1068799814030143 · DOI
  24. Christodoulou, 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41, 2662, 10.1109/TGRS.2003.815404 · DOI
  25. Liu, 2016, Terrain classification with polarimetric SAR based on deep sparse filtering network, 64
  26. Zhang, 2018, Neurocomputing, 275, 781, 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.012 · DOI
  27. Xue, 2018, Deep texture manifold for ground terrain recognition, 558
  28. Shelhamer, 2014, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 39, 640, 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Chen, 2014, Comput. Sci., 4, 357
  30. Chen, 2017, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 40, 834, 10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Zhao, 2017, Pyramid scene parsing network, 2881
  32. Zhao, 2018, PSANet: point-wise spatial attention network for scene parsing, 267
  33. Fu, 2019, Dual attention network for scene segmentation, 3146
  34. Huang, 2019, CCNET: criss-cross attention for semantic segmentation, 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00069 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Yang, 2005, Visual odometry on the mars exploration rovers, 903
  36. Li, 2015, Space Sci. Rev., 190, 85, 10.1007/s11214-014-0134-7 · DOI
  37. Russell, 2008, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 77, 157, 10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Yu, 2017, Dilated residual networks, 636, 10.1109/CVPR.2017.75 · DOI
  39. Sandler, 2018, MobileNetV2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks, 4510
  40. Wang, 2009, An HOG-LBP human detector with partial occlusion handling, 32
  41. Zhang, 2010, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 19, 533, 10.1109/TIP.2009.2035882 · DOI
  42. Wang, 2018, Understanding convolution for semantic segmentation, 1451
  43. Vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need, 5998
  44. Wang, 2018, Non-local neural networks, 7794
  45. Carion, 2020, End-to-end object detection with transformers, 213
  46. Zheng, 2020, A full stage data augmentation method in deep convolutional neural network for natural image classification, 1
  47. Zheng, 2018, IEEE Access, 6, 15844, 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2810849 · DOI
  48. Budvytis, 2017, Large scale labelled video data augmentation for semantic segmentation in driving scenarios, 10.1109/ICCVW.2017.36 · DOI
  49. Harris, 1988, A combined corner and edge detector, 147
  50. Ester, 1996, A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise, 226

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Qiu, L., Li, H., Li, Z., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
China Academy of Space Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Qiu, Linwei
  • Li, Haichao
  • Li, Zhi
  • Wang, Cheng
Venue
Applied Optics
Published
2021-07-12
Volume
60
Issue
21
Pages
6002
ISSN
  • 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-128X
  • 2155-3165
OpenAlex
W3167317651
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Optics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61773383, 42074225)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
Keywords
lunar rover, semantic segmentation, Yutu rover, autonomous navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residual grounding transformer network for terrain recognition on the lunar surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ao.428232
The paper
Qiu, L., Li, H., Li, Z., & Wang, C. (2021). Residual grounding transformer network for terrain recognition on the lunar surface. Applied Optics. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.428232