Cited by 21Advanced Surface Polishing TechniquesSurface Roughness and Optical MeasurementsAdvanced optical system design

Generalized numerical pressure distribution model for smoothing polishing of irregular midspatial frequency errors

Nie, Xuqing, Li, Shengyi, Shi, Feng, Hu, Hao·2014·Applied Optics

Abstract

The smoothing effect of the rigid lap plays an important role in controlling midspatial frequency errors (MSFRs). At present, the pressure distribution between the polishing pad and processed surface is mainly calculated by Mehta's bridging model. However, this classic model does not work for the irregular MSFR. In this paper, a generalized numerical model based on the finite element method (FEM) is proposed to solve this problem. First, the smoothing polishing (SP) process is transformed to a 3D elastic structural FEM model, and the governing matrix equation is gained. By virtue of the boundary conditions applied to the governing matrix equation, the nodal displacement vector and nodal force vector of the pad can be attained, from which the pressure distribution can be extracted. In the partial contact condition, the iterative method is needed. The algorithmic routine is shown, and the applicability of the generalized numerical model is discussed. The detailed simulation is given when the lap is in contact with the irregular surface of different morphologies. A well-designed SP experiment is conducted in our lab to verify the model. A small difference between the experimental data and simulated result shows that the model is totally practicable. The generalized numerical model is applied on a Φ500 mm parabolic surface. The calculated result and measured data after the SP process have been compared, which indicates that the model established in this paper is an effective meth…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ao.53.001020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various tool types have been developed including multilayer elastic tools, viscoelastic tools (like Newtonian fluids), semi-flexible tools (e.g. thin metal layer), viscoplastic (pitch) tools, and mechanically driven tools.

    “Various tool types have been developed including multilayer elastic tools, viscoelastic tools (like Newtonian fluids) [18, 30, 31], semi-flexible tools (e.g. thin metal layer) [17, 19, 20], viscoplastic (pitch) tools [19, 27, 28, 32], and mechanically driven tools[33].”
  • Existing models on the removal of MSF ripples are based on concepts similar to the workpiece-tool mismatch mechanism described above.

    “Existing models on the removal of MSF ripples are based on concepts similar to the workpiece-tool mismatch mechanism described above [26-29].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nie, X., Li, S., Shi, F., & Hu, H.
Affiliations
National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Venue
Applied Optics
Published
2014-02-12
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
1020
ISSN
  • 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-128X
  • 2155-3165
OpenAlex
W2028047351
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Optics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced optical system design
Keywords
pressure distribution, polishing pad, partial contact, parabolic surfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review