The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shaping of steel mold surface of lens array by electrical discharge machining with single rod electrode
Abstract
We propose a method for fabricating a lens array mold by electrical discharge machining (EDM). In this method, the tips of rods are machined individually to form a specific surface, and then a number of the machined rods are arranged to construct an electrode for EDM. The repetition of the EDM process using the electrode enables a number of lens elements to be produced on the mold surface. The effectiveness of our proposed method is demonstrated by shaping a lens array mold made of stainless steel with 16 spherical elements, in which the EDM process with a single rod electrode is repeatedly conducted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There are some shortcomings in manual testing, such as low confidence and high labor intensity.”
From A New Steel Defect Detection Algorithm Based on Deep Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
Design and fabrication of a microlens array by use of a slow tool servo
Yi, A. Y., & Li, L. (2005) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.30.001707 · Cited by 178
Scheiding, S., Yi, A. Y., Gebhardt, A., et al. (2011) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.19.023938 · Cited by 119
Rapid fabrication of miniature lens arrays by four-axis single point diamond machining
McCall, B., & Tkaczyk, T. (2013) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.21.003557 · Cited by 34
Takino, H., Kawai, T., & TAKEUCHI, Y. (2007) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.031 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Miura, 2000, Adv. Abras. Technol., 3, 303
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A New Steel Defect Detection Algorithm Based on Deep Learning
Zhao, W., Chen, F., Huang, H., Li, D., & Cheng, W. (2021) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2021/5592878 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Takino, H., & Hosaka, T.
- Affiliations
- Chiba Institute of Technology (JP)
- ORCID
- Takino, Hideo
- Venue
- Applied Optics
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2014-11-20
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 8002
- ISSN
- 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4522
- OpenAlex
- W2097820820
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Optics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced optical system design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- electrical discharge machining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
