Cited by 40Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Automated surface inspection for steel products using computer vision approach

Xi, Jiaqi, Shentu, Lifeng, Hu, Jikang, Li, Mian·2017·Applied Optics

Abstract

Surface inspection is a critical step in ensuring the product quality in the steel-making industry. In order to relieve inspectors of laborious work and improve the consistency of inspection, much effort has been dedicated to the automated inspection using computer vision approaches over the past decades. However, due to non-uniform illumination conditions and similarity between the surface textures and defects, the present methods are usually applicable to very specific cases. In this paper a new framework for surface inspection has been proposed to overcome these limitations. By investigating the image formation process, a quantitative model characterizing the impact of illumination on the image quality is developed, based on which the non-uniform brightness in the image can be effectively removed. Then a simple classifier is designed to identify the defects among the surface textures. The significance of this approach lies in its robustness to illumination changes and wide applicability to different inspection scenarios. The proposed approach has been successfully applied to the real-time surface inspection of round billets in real manufacturing. Implemented on a conventional industrial PC, the algorithm can proceed at 12.5 frames per second with the successful detection rate being over 90% for turned and skinned billets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ao.56.000184

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manual visual inspection for steel surface defect detection has shortcomings such as low confidence and high labor intensity.

    “There are some shortcomings in manual testing, such as low confidence and high labor intensity.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 40

Authors
Xi, J., Shentu, L., Hu, J., & Li, M.
Affiliations
  • Baosteel (China) (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xi, Jiaqi
  • Shentu, Lifeng
  • Hu, Jikang
  • Li, Mian
Venue
Applied Optics
Published
2017-01-03
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
184
ISSN
  • 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4522
OpenAlex
W2567201298
Cited by
40
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Optics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
automated surface inspection, steel products, non-uniform illumination, illumination model, brightness correction, defect detection, surface texture classification, round billets, real-time inspection, industrial computer vision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review