CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-path Two-photon Interference Effects Between Spatial Modes

Hiekkamäki, Markus, Fickler, Robert·2020·Frontiers in Optics / Laser Science
DOI 10.1364/fio.2020.fm4a.4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Enabled by recent advances, we demonstrate two-photon interference between photon spatial modes. By also scaling the effect up to 4 dimensions, we take a crucial step towards implementing photonic quantum computing with spatial modes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/fio.2020.fm4a.4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New techniques are being investigated to exploit the full potential of QOCT.

    “Thus, new techniques are being investigated in order to exploit the full potential of QOCT [29][30][31][32].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Wang, 2018, Science, 360, 10.1126/science.aar7053 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Labroille, 2014, Optics express, 22, 15599, 10.1364/OE.22.015599 · DOI
  3. Fontaine, 2019, Nature communications, 10, 1, 10.1038/s41467-019-09840-4 · DOI
  4. Brandt, 2020, Optica, 7, 98, 10.1364/OPTICA.375875 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hiekkamäki, M., & Fickler, R.
Venue
Frontiers in Optics / Laser Science
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2020
Pages
FM4A.4
DOI
10.1364/fio.2020.fm4a.4
Cited by
3
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review