The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Change in Refractive Power of the Human Eye in Dim and Bright Light
Abstract
It has been reported that the human eye behaves as though relatively short-sighted in dim light. Observers tend to compensate for this change by setting optical instruments more negatively in dim than in bright light. New measurements of telescope settings by 21 observers reveal an average increase in power of the eye in dim light of 0.59 diopter (range +1.4 diopters to −3.4 diopters). The dilation of the pupil in dim light does not contribute significantly to this phenomenon. The chromatic aberration of the eye was measured in 14 observers with a specially designed spectral stigmatoscope. The refractive power of the eye increases about 3.2 diopters between 750 and 365 mμ. For this reason the Purkinje shift of maximum visual sensitivity from 560 mμ in bright light to 505 mμ in dim light produces a relative myopia in dim light of 0.35 to 0.40 diopter. Persons who display changes larger or smaller than this do so because of involuntary changes in the accommodation in bright and dim light. In dim light the eye enters a state of relatively fixed focus, little different from its condition when the accommodation is paralyzed with homatropine. In this fixed state the accommodation may be relaxed, or it may add as much as 3 diopters to the refractive power of the eye. Experienced observers focus optical instruments in dim light close to the optimal settings determined objectively. Departures of more than 0.5 diopter in either direction from the optimal focus depress the visual sensitivity and acuity. It is concluded that setting optical instruments about 0.4 diopter more negatively in dim than in bright light is justified on the basis of the chromatic aberration of the eye. Many observers gain a further advantage from individual adjustments of focus in dim light, appropriate to their accommodative behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans
Thibos, L. N., Ye, M., Zhang, X., & Bradley, A. (1992) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.31.003594 · Cited by 309
Axial Chromatic Aberration of the Human Eye
Bedford, R. E., & Wyszecki, G. (1957) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.47.0564_1 · Cited by 307
Legras, R., Benard, Y., & Lopez-Gil, N. (2012) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.10.032 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Wald, G., & Griffin, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1947-05-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 321
- ISSN
- 0030-3941 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051708332
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Change in Refractive Power of the Human Eye in Dim and Bright Light. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josa.37.000321
- The paper
- Wald, G., & Griffin, D. R. (1947). The Change in Refractive Power of the Human Eye in Dim and Bright Light. Journal of the Optical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1364/josa.37.000321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.