Cited by 58Optical Polarization and EllipsometryQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics

On the Stokes Parameters for Polarized Radiation*

Falkoff, D. L., MacDonald, J. E.·1951·Journal of the Optical Society of America

Abstract

Get PDF Email Share Share with Facebook Tweet This Post on reddit Share with LinkedIn Add to CiteULike Add to Mendeley Add to BibSonomy Get Citation Copy Citation Text D. L. Falkoff and J. E. MacDonald, "On the Stokes Parameters for Polarized Radiation*," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41, 861-862 (1951) Export Citation BibTex Endnote (RIS) HTML Plain Text Citation alert Save article

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/josa.41.000861

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of a birefringent scatterer is to generate generalized Werner states, in full agreement with experimental results [21].

    “Equation ͑31͒ clearly shows that the effect of a birefringent scatterer is to generate what we called generalized Werner states, in full agreement with our experimental results ͓21͔.”

    From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [21]

  • In Ref. [21], using a setup similar to Fig. 1, the authors experimentally generated entangled two-qubit mixed states that lie upon and below the Werner curve in the linear entropy-tangle plane.

    “In Ref. ͓21͔, by using a setup similar to the one shown in Fig. 1, we have experimentally generated entangled twoqubit mixed states that lie upon and below the Werner curve in the linear entropy-tangle plane ͓41͔.”

    From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The qualitative agreement between the simulation and the experimental findings shown in Fig. 3 of Ref. [21] is evident.

    “The qualitative agreement between the result of this simulation and the experimental findings shown in Fig. 3 of Ref. ͓21͔ is evident.”

    From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The expression of M_Δ given in Eq. (26) is not the most general possible, but it is the correct one for the representation of pure depolarizers with zero polarizance, such as the ones used in Ref. [21].

    “Actually, the expression of M ⌬ given in Eq. ͑26͒ is not the most general possible ͓26͔, but it is the correct one for the representation of pure depolarizers with zero polarizance, such as the ones used in Ref. ͓21͔.”

    From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [21]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falkoff, D. L., & MacDonald, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Journal of the Optical Society of America
Published
1951-11-01
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
861
ISSN
0030-3941 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110948180
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Optical Society of America (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Keywords
Stokes parameters, polarized radiation, polarization, polarimetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review