Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Four cone pigments in women heterozygous for color deficiency

Nagy, Allen L., MacLeod, Donald I. A., Heyneman, Nicholas E., Eisner, Alvin·1981·Journal of the Optical Society of America

Abstract

We find that additivity of trichromatic color matches holds, even in parafoveal vision, for most observers if rods are prevented from seeing the stimuli. Some heterozygous women are exceptions. The failure of the additivity law for these women implies that their eyes contain more than three types of cone with different spectral sensitivities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/josa.71.000719

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Trezona, 1974, Vision Res., 14, 1291, 10.1016/0042-6989(74)90001-7 · DOI
  2. Crone, 1959, Am. J. Ophthalmol., 48, 231, 10.1016/0002-9394(59)91239-5 · DOI
  3. Pokorny, 1973, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 63, 232, 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010732 · DOI
  4. Baylor, 1974, J. Physiol. (London), 242, 729, 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010732 · DOI
  5. Krill, 1965, Science, 149, 186, 10.1126/science.149.3680.186 · DOI
  6. Shapiro, 1979, Science, 204, 1224, 10.1126/science.156396 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 51

Metadata

Authors
Nagy, A. L., MacLeod, D. I. A., Heyneman, N. E., & Eisner, A.
Venue
Journal of the Optical Society of America
Published
1981-06-01
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
719
ISSN
0030-3941
Cited by
51
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review