The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finite-difference time domain method for light scattering by small ice crystals in three-dimensional space
Abstract
The finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method for the solution of light scattering by nonspherical particles has been developed for small ice crystals of hexagonal shapes including solid and hollow columns, plates, and bullet rosettes commonly occurring in cirrus clouds. To account for absorption, we have introduced the effective permittivity and conductivity to circumvent the required complex calculations in the direct discretization of the basic Maxwell equations. In the construction of the finite-difference scheme for the time-marching iteration for the near field the mean values of dielectric constants are defined and evaluated by the Maxwell–Garnett rule. In computing the scattered field in the radiation zone (far field) and the absorption cross section, we have applied a new algorithm involving the integration of the electric field over the volume inside the scatterer on the basis of electromagnetic principles. This algorithm removes the high-angular-resolution requirement in integrating the scattered energy for the computation of the scattering cross section. The applicability and the accuracy of the FDTD technique in three-dimensional space are validated by comparison with Mie scattering results for a number of size parameters and wavelengths. We demonstrate that neither the conventional geometric optics method nor the Mie theory can be used to approximate the scattering, absorption, and polarization features for hexagonal ice crystals with size parameters from approximately 5 to 20.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yee, K. (1966) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.1966.1138693 · Cited by 15,008
Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen
Mie, G. (1908) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19083300302 · Cited by 11,537
Mur, G. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · doi:10.1109/temc.1981.303970 · Cited by 2,565
Cited by
Davis, A. B., & Marshak, A. (2010) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/2/026801 · Cited by 89
Simulations of Contrail Optical Properties and Radiative Forcing for Various Crystal Shapes
Markowicz, K. M., & Witek, M. L. (2011) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/2011jamc2618.1 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, P., & Liou, K. N.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1996-10-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2072
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2148160712
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finite-difference time domain method for light scattering by small ice crystals in three-dimensional space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.13.002072
- The paper
- Yang, P., & Liou, K. N. (1996). Finite-difference time domain method for light scattering by small ice crystals in three-dimensional space. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.13.002072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.