Revised metrology for enhanced accuracy in complex optical constant determination by THz-time-domain spectrometry.
Abstract
THz time-domain spectrometry (TDS) probes the complex polarization response of materials. Various analytical procedures are applied by many to extract the associated material optical constants. This has commonly been done by iteratively varying material parameters in order to achieve a match between experiment and a theoretical transfer function (TF). The poly root behavior of a TF is emphasized for measurements with reflections in the time domain. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the influence of the initial guesses on the accuracy of extracted material parameters. In addition, various ways of representing multiple reflections inside the sample (a Fabry-Perot-like effect) are compared and their contribution to the uncertainty of material parameters is analyzed. Experimental evidence is provided where appropriate to support theoretical statements. Furthermore, this paper offers a basis for data comparison between different THz-TDS systems in transmission mode. Finally, a clear distinction is made between a commonly used basic analysis and an enhanced one, in terms of associated uncertainties in determination of the real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The method relies on the fact that the unwrapped phase of the transfer function implies a single refractive index as a solution.
“This relies on the fact that the unwrapped phase of the transfer function implies a single refractive index as a solution [30].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Sushko, O., Shala, K., Dubrovka, R., & Donnan, R.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- ORCID
- Donnan, Robert
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 979
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2003092049
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/F047061/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
- Keywords
- refractive index, initial guess sensitivity, multiple reflections, Fabry-Perot effect, transfer function, measurement uncertainty, transmission mode, polarization response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review