The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model
Abstract
Several authors have measured the detection ability of human observers for objects in correlated (nonwhite) noise. These studies have shown that the human observer has approximately constant efficiency when compared with a nonprewhitening ideal observer. In this paper we add a frequency-selective mechanism to the ideal-observer model, similar to the channel mechanism that has been demonstrated through experiments that measure a subject's ability to detect grating stimuli. For a number of detection and discrimination tasks, the nonprewhitening ideal-observer model and the channelized ideal-observer model yield similar performance predictions. Thus both models seem equally capable of explaining a considerable body of psychophysical data, and it would be difficult to devise an experiment to determine which model is more nearly correct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, J., Li, T., Lu, H., & Liang, Z. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.882141 · Cited by 533
Model observers for assessment of image quality.
Barrett, H. H., Yao, J., Rolland, J. P., & Myers, K. J. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.21.9758 · Cited by 531
Self-citationAbbey, C. K., & Barrett, H. H. (2001) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.18.000473 · Cited by 324
Self-citationImage quality in CT: From physical measurements to model observers
Verdun, F. R., Racine, D., Ott, J. G., Tapiovaara, M. J., Toroi, P., Bochud, F. O., Veldkamp, W. J. H., Schegerer, A., Bouwman, R. W., Giron, I. H., et al. (2015) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.007 · Cited by 300
Badano, A., Graff, C. G., Badal, A., Sharma, D., Zeng, R., Samuelson, F. W., Glick, S. J., & Myers, K. J. (2018) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5474 · Cited by 235
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Myers, K. J., & Barrett, H. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1987-12-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2447
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2161366386
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.4.002447
- The paper
- Myers, K. J., & Barrett, H. H. (1987). Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.4.002447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.