The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception
Open accessAbstract
To some degree, all current models of visual motion-perception mechanisms depend on the power of the visual signal in various spatiotemporal-frequency bands. Here we show how to construct counterexamples: visual stimuli that are consistently perceived as obviously moving in a fixed direction yet for which Fourier-domain power analysis yields no systematic motion components in any given direction. We provide a general theoretical framework for investigating non-Fourier motion-perception mechanisms; central are the concepts of drift-balanced and microbalanced random stimuli. A random stimulus S is drift balanced if its expected power in the frequency domain is symmetric with respect to temporal frequency, that is, if the expected power in S of every drifting sinusoidal component is equal to the expected power of the sinusoid of the same spatial frequency, drifting at the same rate in the opposite direction. Additionally, S is microbalanced if the result WS of windowing S by any space-time-separable function W is drift balanced. We prove that (i) any space-time-separable random (or nonrandom) stimulus is microbalanced; (ii) any linear combination of pairwise independent microbalanced (respectively, drift-balanced) random stimuli is microbalanced and drift balanced if the expectation of each component is uniformly zero; (iii) the convolution of independent microbalanced and drift-balanced random stimuli is microbalanced and drift balanced; (iv) the product of independent microbalanced random stimuli is microbalanced; and (v) the expected response of any Reichardt detector to any microbalanced random stimulus is zero at every instant in time. Examples are provided of classes of microbalanced random stimuli that display consistent and compelling motion in one direction. All the results and examples from the domain of motion perception are transposable to the space-domain problem of detecting orientation in a texture pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model of human visual-motion sensing
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000322 · Cited by 1,170
Cited by
Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology
(2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426 · Cited by 1,632
Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective
Van Essen, D. C., Anderson, C. H., & Felleman, D. J. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1734518 · Cited by 1,266
A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT
Simoncelli, E. P., & Heeger, D. J. (1998) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00183-1 · Cited by 941
Bertone, A., Mottron, L., Jelenic, P., & Faubert, J. (2005) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh561 · Cited by 536
Sentence comprehension in autism: thinking in pictures with decreased functional connectivity
Kana, R. K. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl164 · Cited by 530
Metadata
- Authors
- Chubb, C., & Sperling, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1988-11-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1986
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2111200213
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.5.001986
- The paper
- Chubb, C., & Sperling, G. (1988). Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.5.001986
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.