Cited by 186Topology Optimization in EngineeringPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Robust topology optimization of photonic crystal waveguides with tailored dispersion properties

Open access
Wang, Fengwen, Jensen, Jakob S., Sigmund, Ole·2011·Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Abstract

A robust topology optimization method is formulated to tailor dispersion properties of photonic crystal waveguides, with consideration of manufacturing uncertainties. Slightly dilated and eroded realizations are considered as well as the real structure, and by worst-case optimization, we also ensure a satisfactory performance in the case of an under- or overetching scenario in the manufacturing process. Two photonic crystal waveguides facilitating slow light with group indexes of ng=25 and ng=100 and bandwidths of Δω/ω=2.3% and 0.3%, respectively, are obtained through the proposed robust design procedure. In addition, a novel waveguide design with two different constant group index waveguide regions is demonstrated. The numerical examples illustrate the efficiency of the robust optimization formulation and indicate that the topology optimization procedure can provide a useful tool for designing waveguides that are robust to manufacturing uncertainties such as under or overetching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/josab.28.000387

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of erosion and dilation as robustness metrics was previously demonstrated in the design of topology-optimized photonic crystals.

    “The use of erosion and dilation as robustness metrics was previously demonstrated in the design of topology-optimized photonic crystals [29].”

    From Robust design of topology-optimized metasurfaces (2019) · cites this paper as [29]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Baba, 2008, Nat. Photon., 2, 465, 10.1038/nphoton.2008.146 · DOI
  2. Mori, 2005, Opt. Express, 13, 9398, 10.1364/OPEX.13.009398 · DOI
  3. Mori, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 5264, 10.1364/OE.15.005264 · DOI
  4. Frandsen, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 9444, 10.1364/OE.14.009444 · DOI
  5. Li, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 6227, 10.1364/OE.16.006227 · DOI
  6. Kubo, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 2981, 10.1364/OL.32.002981 · DOI
  7. Borel, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 1996, 10.1364/OPEX.12.001996 · DOI
  8. Jensen, 2004, Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 2022, 10.1063/1.1688450 · DOI
  9. Jensen, 2005, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 22, 1191, 10.1364/JOSAB.22.001191 · DOI
  10. Stainko, 2007, Waves in Random and Complex Media, 17, 477, 10.1080/17455030701501851 · DOI
  11. Sigmund, 1997, Mechan. Struct. Mach., 25, 493, 10.1080/08905459708945415 · DOI
  12. Sigmund, 1998, Struct. Opt., 16, 68, 10.1007/BF01214002 · DOI
  13. Bruns, 2001, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 190, 3443, 10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00278-4 · DOI
  14. Bourdin, 2001, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 50, 2143, 10.1002/nme.116 · DOI
  15. Guest, 2004, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 61, 238, 10.1002/nme.1064 · DOI
  16. Wang, 2005, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 63, 1911, 10.1002/nme.1347 · DOI
  17. Sigmund, 2007, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 33, 401, 10.1007/s00158-006-0087-x · DOI
  18. Guest, 2009, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 199, 123, 10.1016/j.cma.2009.09.023 · DOI
  19. Xu, 2009, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 41, 495, 10.1007/s00158-009-0452-7 · DOI
  20. Sigmund, 2009, Acta Mech. Sin., 25, 227, 10.1007/s10409-009-0240-z · DOI
  21. Seyranian, 1994, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 8, 207, 10.1007/BF01742705 · DOI
  22. Pedersen, 2003, Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 25, 436, 10.1007/s00158-003-0294-7 · DOI
  23. Svanberg, 2002, SIAM J. Optim., 12, 555, 10.1137/S1052623499362822 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, F., Jensen, J. S., & Sigmund, O.
Affiliations
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Venue
Journal of the Optical Society of America B
Published
2011-02-08
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
387
ISSN
  • 0740-3224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8540
OpenAlex
W2023124704
Cited by
186
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
34.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Optical Society of America B (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Villum Fonden
  • Eurohorcs/ESF European Young Investigator Award (EURYI, www.esf.org/ euryi)
  • Danish Center for Scientific Computing (DCSC)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Topology Optimization in Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Keywords
robust topology optimization, photonic crystal waveguides, dispersion tuning, production uncertainty, underetching, overetching, worst-case optimization, slow light, group index, waveguide design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review