CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fourth-order interference technique for determining the coherence time of a light beam

Ou, Z. Y., Gage, E. C., Magill, B. E., Mandel, L.·1989·Journal of the Optical Society of America B
DOI 10.1364/josab.6.000100
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A new experimental procedure for determining the (second-order) coherence time of a light beam is described that is based on a combination of conventional interferometry with an intensity-correlation technique. It permits measurements of coherence times that are several orders of magnitude shorter than the resolving times of the detectors, which ordinarily limit correlation measurements. The validity of the method is demonstrated by an experiment in which the transverse fluorescent light from a dye laser is measured.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/josab.6.000100

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum entanglement is the fundamental resource in quantum communication, quantum metrology, and quantum computing.

    “At the heart of quantum information is the notion of quantum entanglement [10]-the fundamental resource in quantum communication [11], quantum metrology [12], and quantum computing [13].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

  • The resolution in space and phase is enhanced by a factor of N, i.e. scales as 1/N, for N00N states.

    “The resolution in space and phase is enhanced by a factor of N, i.e. scales as 1/N.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Mandel, 1965, Rev. Mod. Phys., 37, 231, 10.1103/RevModPhys.37.231 · DOI
  2. Richter, 1977, Abh. Akad. Wiss. DDR, 7N, 245
  3. Mandel, 1983, Phys. Rev. A, 28, 929, 10.1103/PhysRevA.28.929 · DOI
  4. Ou, 1988, Phys. Rev. A, 37, 1607, 10.1103/PhysRevA.37.1607 · DOI
  5. Ghosh, 1986, Phys. Rev. A, 34, 3962, 10.1103/PhysRevA.34.3962 · DOI
  6. Ou, 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 54, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.54 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ou, Z. Y., Gage, E. C., Magill, B. E., & Mandel, L.
Venue
Journal of the Optical Society of America B
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
1989-01-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
100
ISSN
  • 0740-3224
  • 1520-8540
DOI
10.1364/josab.6.000100
Cited by
57
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review