The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coherent detection in optical fiber systems
Open accessAbstract
The drive for higher performance in optical fiber systems has renewed interest in coherent detection. We review detection methods, including noncoherent, differentially coherent, and coherent detection, as well as a hybrid method. We compare modulation methods encoding information in various degrees of freedom (DOF). Polarization-multiplexed quadrature-amplitude modulation maximizes spectral efficiency and power efficiency, by utilizing all four available DOF, the two field quadratures in the two polarizations. Dual-polarization homodyne or heterodyne downconversion are linear processes that can fully recover the received signal field in these four DOF. When downconverted signals are sampled at the Nyquist rate, compensation of transmission impairments can be performed using digital signal processing (DSP). Linear impairments, including chromatic dispersion and polarization-mode dispersion, can be compensated quasi-exactly using finite impulse response filters. Some nonlinear impairments, such as intra-channel four-wave mixing and nonlinear phase noise, can be compensated partially. Carrier phase recovery can be performed using feedforward methods, even when phase-locked loops may fail due to delay constraints. DSP-based compensation enables a receiver to adapt to time-varying impairments, and facilitates use of advanced forward-error-correction codes. We discuss both single- and multi-carrier system implementations. For a given modulation format, using coherent detection, they offer fundamentally the same spectral efficiency and power efficiency, but may differ in practice, because of different impairments and implementation details. With anticipated advances in analog-to-digital converters and integrated circuit technology, DSP-based coherent receivers at bit rates up to 100 Gbit/s should become practical within the next few years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Cited by
Zhong, K., Zhou, X., Huo, J., Yu, C., Lu, C., & Lau, A. P. T. (2018) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2018.2793881 · Cited by 554
Self-citationWillner, A. E., Khaleghi, S., Chitgarha, M. R., & Yilmaz, O. F. (2014) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2013.2287219 · Cited by 512
Phase Retrieval via Matrix Completion
Candès, E. J., Eldar, Y. C., Strohmer, T., & Voroninski, V. (2015) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/151005099 · Cited by 481
Ultralow noise miniature external cavity semiconductor laser
Liang, W., Ilchenko, V. S., Eliyahu, D., Savchenkov, A. A., Matsko, A. B., Seidel, D., & Maleki, L. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8371 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Ip, E., Lau, A. P. T., Barros, D. J. F., & Kahn, J. M.
- Venue
- Optics Express
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 753
- ISSN
- 1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092754166
- Cited by
- 901
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 54.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coherent detection in optical fiber systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/oe.16.000753
- The paper
- Ip, E., Lau, A. P. T., Barros, D. J. F., & Kahn, J. M. (2008). Coherent detection in optical fiber systems. Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.16.000753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.