The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sample drift correction in 3D fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy
Open accessAbstract
The recent development of diffraction-unlimited far-field fluorescence microscopy has overcome the classical resolution limit of ~250 nm of conventional light microscopy by about a factor of ten. The improved resolution, however, reveals not only biological structures at an unprecedented resolution, but is also susceptible to sample drift on a much finer scale than previously relevant. Without correction, sample drift leads to smeared images with decreased resolution, and in the worst case to misinterpretation of the imaged structures. This poses a problem especially for techniques such as Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy (FPALM/PALM) or Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM), which often require minutes recording time. Here we discuss an approach that corrects for three-dimensional (3D) drift in images of fixed samples without the requirement for fiduciary markers or instrument modifications. Drift is determined by calculating the spatial cross-correlation function between subsets of localized particles imaged at different times. Correction down to ~5 nm precision is achieved despite the fact that different molecules are imaged in each frame. We demonstrate the performance of our drift correction algorithm with different simulated structures and analyze its dependence on particle density and localization precision. By imaging mitochondria with Biplane FPALM we show our algorithm's feasibility in a practical application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A trans-synaptic nanocolumn aligns neurotransmitter release to receptors
Tang, A.-H., Chen, H., Li, T. P., Metzbower, S. R., MacGillavry, H. D., & Blanpied, T. A. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19058 · Cited by 677
Walking along chromosomes with super-resolution imaging, contact maps, and integrative modeling
Nir, G., Farabella, I., Pérez Estrada, C., Ebeling, C. G., Beliveau, B. J., Sasaki, H. M., Lee, S. D., Nguyen, S. C., McCole, R. B., Chattoraj, S., et al. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007872 · Cited by 261
Self-citationChen, C., Zong, S., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, B., & Cui, Y. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201901014 · Cited by 107
Akiyama, H., Ramirez, N.-G. P., Gudheti, M. V., & Gummuluru, S. (2015) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004751 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Mlodzianoski, M. J., Schreiner, J. M., Callahan, S. P., Smolková, K., Dlasková, A., Šantorová, J., Ježek, P., & Bewersdorf, J.
- Venue
- Optics Express
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2011-07-20
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 15009
- ISSN
- 1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997904982
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sample drift correction in 3D fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/oe.19.015009
- The paper
- Mlodzianoski, M. J., Schreiner, J. M., Callahan, S. P., Smolková, K., Dlasková, A., Šantorová, J., Ježek, P., & Bewersdorf, J. (2011). Sample drift correction in 3D fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.19.015009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.