Cited by 62Thin-Film Transistor TechnologiesOptical Coatings and GratingsSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dielectric particle and void resonators for thin film solar cell textures

Open access

Abstract

Using Mie theory and Rigorous Coupled Wave Analysis (RCWA) we compare the properties of dielectric particle and void resonators. We show that void resonators-low refractive index inclusions within a high index embedding medium-exhibit larger bandwidth resonances, reduced peak scattering intensity, different polarization anisotropies, and enhanced forward scattering when compared to their particle (high index inclusions in a low index medium) counterparts. We evaluate amorphous silicon solar cell textures comprising either arrays of voids or particles. Both designs support substantial absorption enhancements (up to 45%) relative to a flat cell with anti-reflection coating, over a large range of cell thicknesses. By leveraging void-based textures 90% of above-bandgap photons are absorbed in cells with maximal vertical dimension of 100 nm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.19.025729

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Campbell, 1993, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 10, 2410, 10.1364/JOSAB.10.002410 · DOI
  2. Green, 1999, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl., 7, 317, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(199907/08)7:4<317::AID-PIP282>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  3. Müller, 2004, Sol. Energy, 77, 917, 10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.015 · DOI
  4. Atwater, 2010, Nat. Mater., 9, 205, 10.1038/nmat2629 · DOI
  5. Ferry, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, A237, 10.1364/OE.18.00A237 · DOI
  6. Panoiu, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 2825, 10.1364/OL.32.002825 · DOI
  7. Akimov, 2010, Appl. Phys. Lett., 96, 073111, 10.1063/1.3315942 · DOI
  8. Grandidier, 2011, Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.), 23, 1272, 10.1002/adma.201004393 · DOI
  9. Kroll, 2008, Phys. Status Solidi, 205, 2777, 10.1002/pssa.200880453 · DOI
  10. Cao, 2010, Nano Lett., 10, 439, 10.1021/nl9036627 · DOI
  11. Bandiera, 2008, Appl. Phys. Lett., 93, 193103, 10.1063/1.3021480 · DOI
  12. Falcone, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 197401, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.197401 · DOI
  13. Du, 2011, Opt. Lett., 36, 1713, 10.1364/OL.36.001713 · DOI
  14. Yu, 2010, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, 17491, 10.1073/pnas.1008296107 · DOI
  15. Teperik, 2008, Nat. Photonics, 2, 299, 10.1038/nphoton.2008.76 · DOI
  16. Lal, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 11256, 10.1364/OE.19.011256 · DOI
  17. Gaylord, 1986, Appl. Opt., 25, 4562, 10.1364/AO.25.004562 · DOI
  18. Motamedi, 1992, Appl. Opt., 31, 4371, 10.1364/AO.31.004371 · DOI
  19. Gombert, 1998, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 54, 333, 10.1016/S0927-0248(98)00084-1 · DOI
  20. García-Etxarri, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 4815, 10.1364/OE.19.004815 · DOI
  21. Gómez-Medina, 2011, J. Nanophotonics, 5, 053512, 10.1117/1.3603941 · DOI
  22. Schuller, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 24084, 10.1364/OE.17.024084 · DOI
  23. Catchpole, 2008, Appl. Phys. Lett., 93, 191113, 10.1063/1.3021072 · DOI
  24. Evlyukhin, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett. B, 82, 045404, 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.045404 · DOI
  25. Moharam, 1995, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 12, 1068, 10.1364/JOSAA.12.001068 · DOI
  26. Leng, 1998, Thin Solid Films, 313–314, 132, 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00799-2 · DOI
  27. Shainline, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 23323, 10.1364/OE.17.023323 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mann, S. A., Grote, R. R., Osgood, R. M., & Schuller, J. A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
19
Issue
25
Pages
25729
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061511463
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0001085)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Optical Coatings and Gratings
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Keywords
thin-film solar cells, light trapping, absorption enhancement, Mie theory, rigorous coupled-wave analysis, polarization anisotropy, forward scattering, amorphous silicon, refractive index contrast, antireflection coatings
MeSH terms
Equipment Design, Electric Power Supplies, Refractometry, Solar Energy, Transducers, Computer-Aided Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Nanoparticles, Optical Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review