The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphene Oxide vs Reduced Graphene Oxide as saturable absorbers for Er-doped passively mode-locked fiber laser
Open accessAbstract
In this work we demonstrate comprehensive studies on graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) based saturable absorbers (SA) for mode-locking of Er-doped fiber lasers. The paper describes the fabrication process of both saturable absorbers and detailed comparison of their parameters. Our results show, that there is no significant difference in the laser performance between the investigated SA. Both provided stable, mode-locked operation with sub-400 fs soliton pulses and more than 9 nm optical bandwidth at 1560 nm center wavelength. It has been shown that GO might be successfully used as an efficient SA without the need of its reduction to rGO. Taking into account simpler manufacturing technology and the possibility of mass production, GO seems to be a good candidate as a cost-effective material for saturable absorbers for Er-doped fiber lasers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tien, H.-W., Huang, Y.-L., Yang, S.-Y., Wang, J.-Y., & Ma, C.-C. M. (2011) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.022 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Tarcan, R., Todor-Boer, O., Petrovai, I., Leordean, C., Astilean, S., & Botiz, I. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c9tc04916a · Cited by 723
Guex, L. G., Sacchi, B., Peuvot, K. F., Andersson, R. L., Pourrahimi, A. M., Ström, V., Farris, S., & Olsson, R. T. (2017) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c7nr02943h · Cited by 587
Du, J., Wang, Q., Jiang, G., Xu, C., Zhao, C., Xiang, Y., Chen, Y., Wen, S., & Zhang, H. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06346 · Cited by 465
Zhao, C., Zou, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Lu, S., Zhang, H., Wen, S., & Tang, D. (2012) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.20.027888 · Cited by 441
Rochman, R. A., Wahyuningsih, S., Ramelan, A. H., & Hanif, Q. A. (2019) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/509/1/012119 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Sobon, G., Sotor, J., Jagiello, J., Kozinski, R., Zdrojek, M., Holdynski, M., Paletko, P., Boguslawski, J., Lipinska, L., & Abramski, K. M.
- Venue
- Optics Express
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2012-08-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 19463
- ISSN
- 1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057117206
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphene Oxide vs Reduced Graphene Oxide as saturable absorbers for Er-doped passively mode-locked fiber laser. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/oe.20.019463
- The paper
- Sobon, G., Sotor, J., Jagiello, J., Kozinski, R., Zdrojek, M., Holdynski, M., Paletko, P., Boguslawski, J., Lipinska, L., & Abramski, K. M. (2012). Graphene Oxide vs Reduced Graphene Oxide as saturable absorbers for Er-doped passively mode-locked fiber laser. Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.019463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
