CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-photon interference with continuous-wave multi-mode coherent light

Kim, Yong-Su, Slattery, Oliver, Kuo, Paulina S., Tang, Xiao·2014·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.22.003611
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.22.003611

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bunching and anti-bunching are typical bosonic and fermionic behaviours, respectively.

    “Interestingly, bunching and anti-bunching are typical bosonic and fermionic behaviours, respectively.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Mandel, 1999, Rev. Mod. Phys., 71, S274, 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S274 · DOI
  2. Rarity, 2005, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 7, S171, 10.1088/1464-4266/7/7/007 · DOI
  3. Ou, 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 54, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.54 · DOI
  4. Legero, 2003, Appl. Phys. B, 77, 797, 10.1007/s00340-003-1337-x · DOI
  5. Legero, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 070503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.070503 · DOI
  6. Legero, 2006, Adv. Atom. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys., 53, 253, 10.1016/S1049-250X(06)53009-5 · DOI
  7. Zou, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 318, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.318 · DOI
  8. Kwon, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 063801, 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.063801 · DOI
  9. Lim, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 160401, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.160401 · DOI
  10. Kim, 2012, Nature Phys., 8, 117, 10.1038/nphys2178 · DOI
  11. Knill, 2001, Nature, 409, 46, 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wang, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 70, 041801, 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.041801 · DOI
  13. Cheng, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 093903, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.093903 · DOI
  14. Xiong, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 173601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.173601 · DOI
  15. Zhai, 2005, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 043805, 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.043805 · DOI
  16. Kim, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 063843, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.063843 · DOI
  17. de Broglie, 1968, Phys. Rev., 172, 1284, 10.1103/PhysRev.172.1284 · DOI
  18. Baek, 2007, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 46, 7720, 10.1143/JJAP.46.7720 · DOI
  19. Kwon, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 13059, 10.1364/OE.17.013059 · DOI
  20. Kwon, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 25492, 10.1364/OE.21.025492 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, Y.-S., Slattery, O., Kuo, P. S., & Tang, X.
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2014-02-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
3611
ISSN
1094-4087
DOI
10.1364/oe.22.003611
Cited by
32
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review