Cited by 75Advanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis

Achieving flexible low-scattering metasurface based on randomly distribution of meta-elements

Open access
Zhao, Junming, Sima, Boyu, Jia, Nan, Wang, Cheng, Zhu, Bo, Jiang, Tian, Feng, Yijun·2016·Optics Express

Abstract

In the paper, a flexible low-scattering metasurface is proposed and realized. The layout is composed of similar "#" shaped elements with variable sizes which are randomly distributed along the surface. The various dimensions of the meta-elements lead to different reflection phases for the meta-elements with respect to the incident plane wave, resulting a diffuse reflection surface and exhibiting a broadband backward low-scattering property. In consideration of the flexibility, metasurfaces composed of printed metallic element films attaching with flexible substrate are designed, fabricated and measured in microwave domain. The measurement results show that 10dB radar cross section (RCS) reduction is obtained across the X-band by coating them to either metallic plates or metallic cylinders with only 1/8 working wavelength thickness. We think that the proposed flexible metasurface is applicable to other frequency bands and can be applied in EM stealth technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.24.027849

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurements indicated that coating a cylindrical metal surface with an FIM can reduce the radar cross-section by 10 dB across the X band.

    “Measurements indicated that coating a cylindrical metal surface with an FIM can reduce the radar cross-section by 10 dB across the X band [125].”

    From Emerging Technologies in Intelligent Metasurfaces: Shaping the Future of Wireless Communications (2026) · cites this paper as [125]

    The paper’s “Fabrication and measurement” section reports that measured results agreed with 10 dB RCS reductions for metasurface-coated metal cylinders over frequency ranges spanning the X band. But it specifies that these are *backward* RCS reductions and says the total average reduction is lower; the claim omits that directional limitation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By randomly arranging metallic patches, FIMs can significantly reduce specular reflection at various angles of incidence.

    “For example, by randomly arranging metallic patches, the authors of [124], [125] showed that FIMs can significantly reduce specular reflection at various angles of incidence.”

    From Emerging Technologies in Intelligent Metasurfaces: Shaping the Future of Wireless Communications (2026) · cites this paper as [125]

    The Introduction and Theoretical design and analysis sections describe randomly distributed metallic meta-elements that redirect reflected energy and reduce backward scattering. The Fabrication and measurement section reports nearly 10 dB backward RCS reduction for coated plates, but discusses different incident polarizations and frequencies, not reductions at various angles of incidence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, and W. J. Stewart, “Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47(11), 2075–2084 (1999). Crossref

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J., Sima, B., Jia, N., Wang, C., Zhu, B., Jiang, T., & Feng, Y.
Affiliations
Nanjing University (CN)
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
24
Issue
24
Pages
27849
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550620481
Cited by
75
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (MOE) (20110091120052, 20120091110032)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61301017, 61371034, 61571216, 61571218)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Keywords
flexible metasurface, radar cross section reduction, diffuse reflectance, backscattering, microwave metasurfaces, flexible substrates, electromagnetic stealth, X-band

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review