CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic tailoring of an optical skyrmion lattice in surface plasmon polaritons

Bai, Chunyan, Chen, Jian, Zhang, Yuxing, Zhang, Dawei, Zhan, Qiwen·2020·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.384718
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A skyrmion is a topologically protected soliton with a spin structure on the micro/nano scale that has promising applications in magnetic information storage and spintronics devices. This study focuses on the optical skyrmion lattice structures created in the surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) field. Both the Néel-type optical skyrmion lattice formed by the electric field vector and Bloch-type optical skyrmion lattice formed by the magnetic field vector are generated via exciting a hexagonal grating structure on the metal surface with six Gaussian optical spots. Such a multiple-spot excitation can be realized through tightly focusing a specially designed complex field with a high NA lens. Through introducing the phase difference of the excitation beams to shift the SPP standing waves, the shape and position of the optical skyrmion lattice can be dynamically controlled. Both the electric field vector and magnetic field vector are evaluated quantitatively based on the electric and magnetic field obtained by finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulation to demonstrate the validity and capability of the proposed technique.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.384718

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Skyrme, 1962, Nucl. Phys., 31, 556, 10.1016/0029-5582(62)90775-7 · DOI
  2. Yu, 2010, Nature, 465, 901, 10.1038/nature09124 · DOI
  3. Nagaosa, 2013, Nat. Nanotechnol., 8, 899, 10.1038/nnano.2013.243 · DOI
  4. Röessler, 2006, Nature, 442, 797, 10.1038/nature05056 · DOI
  5. Yu, 2011, Nat. Mater., 10, 106, 10.1038/nmat2916 · DOI
  6. Münzer, 2010, Phys. Rev. B, 81, 041203, 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.041203 · DOI
  7. Heinze, 2011, Nat. Phys., 7, 713, 10.1038/nphys2045 · DOI
  8. Mulbauer, 2009, Science, 323, 915, 10.1126/science.1166767 · DOI
  9. Schulz, 2012, Nat. Phys., 8, 301, 10.1038/nphys2231 · DOI
  10. Tang, 2015, J. Appl. Phys., 117, 203902, 10.1063/1.4921698 · DOI
  11. Jiang, 2017, Phys. Rep., 704, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.08.001 · DOI
  12. Parkin, 2008, Science, 320, 190, 10.1126/science.1145799 · DOI
  13. Pfleiderer, 2011, Nat. Phys., 7, 673, 10.1038/nphys2081 · DOI
  14. Zhang, 2018, Nat. Commun., 1, 36, 10.1038/s42005-018-0040-5 · DOI
  15. Kurumaji, 2019, Science, 365, 914, 10.1126/science.aau0968 · DOI
  16. Foster, 2019, Nat. Phys., 15, 655, 10.1038/s41567-019-0476-x · DOI
  17. Ackerman, 2017, Nat. Commun., 8, 673, 10.1038/s41467-017-00659-5 · DOI
  18. Fukuda, 2018, Opt. Express, 26, 1174, 10.1364/OE.26.001174 · DOI
  19. Sohn, 2019, Opt. Express, 27, 29055, 10.1364/OE.27.029055 · DOI
  20. Du, 2019, Nat. Phys., 15, 650, 10.1038/s41567-019-0487-7 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Everschor, 2012, Phys. Rev. B, 86, 054432, 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.054432 · DOI
  22. Kong, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 067203, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.067203 · DOI
  23. Mochizuki, 2014, Nat. Mater., 13, 241, 10.1038/nmat3862 · DOI
  24. Zang, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 136804, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.136804 · DOI
  25. Lin, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 207202, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.207202 · DOI
  26. Yamane, 2015, Sci. Rep., 4, 6901, 10.1038/srep06901 · DOI
  27. Wang, 2015, Phys. Rev. B, 92, 020403, 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.020403 · DOI
  28. Yang, 2018, Opt. Express, 26, 8778, 10.1364/OE.26.008778 · DOI
  29. Barnes, 2003, Nature, 424, 824, 10.1038/nature01937 · DOI
  30. Lalanne, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 263902, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.263902 · DOI
  31. Gjonaj, 2014, Nano Lett., 14, 5598, 10.1021/nl502080n · DOI
  32. Bar-Lev, 2015, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 32, 923, 10.1364/JOSAB.32.000923 · DOI
  33. Chang, 2005, Opt. Express, 13, 3150, 10.1364/OPEX.13.003150 · DOI
  34. Yang, 2014, Nano Lett., 14, 704, 10.1021/nl403954h · DOI
  35. Kuo, 2018, Opt. Express, 26, 19123, 10.1364/OE.26.019123 · DOI
  36. Wei, 2010, Nano Lett., 10, 2531, 10.1021/nl1011068 · DOI
  37. Wei, 2014, Nano Lett., 14, 4634, 10.1021/nl501695c · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bai, C., Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, D., & Zhan, Q.
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2020-03-25
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
10320
ISSN
1094-4087
DOI
10.1364/oe.384718
Cited by
57
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61775140, 61805142)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19060502500)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review