The DOI matches its Crossref record.
112Gb/s DP-QPSK Transmission Over 2427km SSMF Using Small-Size Silicon Photonic IQ Modulator and Low-Power CMOS Driver
Abstract
We report 2427km, 112Gb/s DP-QPSK optical transmission using the smallest Silicon Photonic modulator and lowest power CMOS MZM driver. BER characterization of this device demonstrates comparable performance relative to a commercial LiNbO3 modulator.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Coherent transceivers in silicon photonics/electronics platforms proved that the technology could compete in performance with their LiNbO3 photonic and III-V electronic counterparts23–25.”
From Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Marris-Morini, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 10838, 10.1364/OE.14.010838 · DOI
- Spector, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 11027, 10.1364/OE.16.011027 · DOI
- Gardes, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 21986, 10.1364/OE.17.021986 · DOI
- Feng, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, 7994, 10.1364/OE.18.007994 · DOI
- Dong, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 21181, 10.1364/OE.20.021181 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics
Shekhar, S., Bogaerts, W., Chrostowski, L., Bowers, J. E., Hochberg, M., Soref, R., & Shastri, B. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0 · Cited by 878
Tutorial on narrow linewidth tunable semiconductor lasers using Si/III-V heterogeneous integration
Tran, M. A., Huang, D., & Bowers, J. E. (2019) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/1.5124254 · Cited by 303
Single-Chip Silicon Photonics 100-Gb/s Coherent Transceiver
Doerr, C., Chen, L., Vermeulen, D., Nielsen, T., Azemati, S., Stulz, S., McBrien, G., Xu, X.-M., Mikkelsen, B., Givehchi, M., et al. (2014) · Optical Fiber Communication Conference: Postdeadline Papers · doi:10.1364/ofc.2014.th5c.1 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Milivojevic, B., Raabe, C., Shastri, A., Webster, M., Metz, P., Sunder, S., Chattin, B., Wiese, S., Dama, B., & Shastri, K.
- Affiliations
- Cisco Systems (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Milivojevic, B.
- Raabe, C.
- Shastri, A.
- Webster, M.
- Metz, P.
- Sunder, S.
- Chattin, B.
- Wiese, S.
- Dama, B.
- Shastri, K.
- ORCID
- Webster, M.
- Venue
- Optical Fiber Communication Conference/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference 2013
- Publisher
- OSA
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- OTh1D.1
- OpenAlex
- W2011705277
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 19.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Optical Fiber Communication Conference (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Network Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
- Keywords
- DP-QPSK, silicon photonic modulators, silicon photonics, CMOS driver, standard single-mode fiber, long-haul optical transmission, 112 Gb/s, bit error rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review