The DOI matches its Crossref record.
42%-efficient single-pass cw second-harmonic generation in periodically poled lithium niobate
Abstract
We present a full-wafer fabrication process for periodically poled lithium niobate with a 6.5-mum domain period. Samples that were 53 mm long and 0.5 mm thick were obtained with this process for single-pass cw 1064-nm Nd:YAG second-harmonic generation. These samples exhibited 78% of the ideal nonlinear coefficient, had a measured conversion efficiency of 8.5% /W in the low-power limit, and produced 2.7 W of cw 532-nm output with 6.5 W of cw input, which corresponds to 42% power conversion efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Broadband, electrically tunable third-harmonic generation in graphene
Soavi, G., Wang, G., Rostami, H., Purdie, D. G., De Fazio, D., Ma, T., Luo, B., Wang, J., Ott, A. K., Yoon, D., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0145-8 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, G. D., Batchko, R. G., Tulloch, W. M., Weise, D. R., Fejer, M. M., & Byer, R. L.
- Venue
- Optics Letters
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1997-12-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1834
- ISSN
- 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4794
- OpenAlex
- W2019245808
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 42%-efficient single-pass cw second-harmonic generation in periodically poled lithium niobate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ol.22.001834
- The paper
- Miller, G. D., Batchko, R. G., Tulloch, W. M., Weise, D. R., Fejer, M. M., & Byer, R. L. (1997). 42%-efficient single-pass cw second-harmonic generation in periodically poled lithium niobate. Optics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.22.001834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
