Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Time-gated biological imaging by use of colloidal quantum dots

Dahan, M., Laurence, T., Pinaud, F., Chemla, D. S., Alivisatos, A. P., Sauer, M., Weiss, S.·2001·Optics Letters

Abstract

The long (but not too long) fluorescence lifetime of CdSe semiconductor quantum dots was exploited to enhance fluorescence biological imaging contrast and sensitivity by time-gated detection. Significant and selective reduction of the autofluorescence contribution to the overall image was achieved, and enhancement of the signal-to-background ratio by more than an order of magnitude was demonstrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.26.000825

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Dahan, M., Laurence, T., Pinaud, F., Chemla, D. S., Alivisatos, A. P., Sauer, M., & Weiss, S.
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
825
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
OpenAlex
W2016857312
Cited by
342
References
0
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time-gated biological imaging by use of colloidal quantum dots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ol.26.000825
The paper
Dahan, M., Laurence, T., Pinaud, F., Chemla, D. S., Alivisatos, A. P., Sauer, M., & Weiss, S. (2001). Time-gated biological imaging by use of colloidal quantum dots. Optics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.26.000825

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.