Cited by 66Nonlinear Photonic SystemsNonlinear Waves and SolitonsPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics

Observation of discrete gap solitons in binary waveguide arrays

Open access
Morandotti, Roberto, Mandelik, Daniel, Silberberg, Yaron, Aitchison, J. Stewart, Sorel, Marc, Christodoulides, Demetrios N., Sukhorukov, Andrey A., Kivshar, Yuri S.·2004·Optics Letters

Abstract

We report an experimental study of discrete gap solitons in binary arrays of optical waveguides. We observe self-focusing indicating soliton generation when the inclination angle of an input beam is slightly above the Bragg angle and show that the propagation direction of the emerging gap soliton is influenced by the effect of interband momentum exchange.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.29.002890

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the tight-binding approximation, light transport in the binary lattice is described by coupled-mode equations for the modal field amplitudes c_n in the various waveguides.

    “In the tight-binding approximation, light transport in the binary lattice is described by coupled-mode equations for the modal field amplitudes c n in the various waveguides [17,20,21]”

    From Photonic analog of Zitterbewegung in binary waveguide arrays (2010) · cites this paper as [20]

    In the passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable), the paper describes light propagation in a binary waveguide array, but models it with a normalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation for the field envelope E(x,z). It does not present a tight-binding approximation or coupled-mode equations for waveguide amplitudes c_n, so the claimed modeling detail is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The tight-binding model supports two minibands, whose dispersion curves are obtained by the plane-wave Ansatz.

    “The tight-binding model (2) supports two minibands, whose dispersion curves are readily obtained by the plane-wave Ansatz c n ( q ) ∼ exp( iqna -iωz ) and read [20]”

    From Photonic analog of Zitterbewegung in binary waveguide arrays (2010) · cites this paper as [20]

    The discussion of the wave spectrum and Fig. 1(b) describe first- and second-band Bloch-wave dispersion curves. But the paper models propagation with a continuous nonlinear Schrödinger equation, not the cited tight-binding model, and does not derive its dispersion curves using the stated discrete plane-wave ansatz. The copy gives no page number for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 66

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]1. D. N. Christodoulides and R. I. Joseph, Opt. Lett. 13, 794 (1988).
  2. [2]2. H. S. Eisenberg, Y. Silberberg, R. Morandotti, A. R. Boyd, and J. S. Aitchison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3383 (1998).
  3. [3]3. A. A. Sukhorukov and Yu. S. Kivshar, Opt. Lett. 27, 2112 (2002).
  4. [4]4. A. A. Sukhorukov and Yu. S. Kivshar, Opt. Lett. 28, 2345 (2003).
  5. [5]5. D. Mandelik, R. Morandotti, J. S. Aitchison, and Y. Silberberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093904 (2004).
  6. [7]7. A. A. Sukhorukov, D. Neshev, W. Krolikowski, and Yu. S. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093901 (2004).
  7. [8]8. J. Feng, Opt. Lett. 18, 1302 (1993).
  8. [9]9. D. Mandelik, H. S. Eisenberg, Y. Silberberg, R. Morandotti, and J. S. Aitchison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 253902 (2003).
  9. [10]10. R. Morandotti, H. S. Eisenberg, Y. Silberberg, M. Sorel, and J. S. Aitchison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3296 (2001).

Authors
Morandotti, R., Mandelik, D., Silberberg, Y., Aitchison, J. S., Sorel, M., Christodoulides, D. N., Sukhorukov, A. A., & Kivshar, Y. S.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (CA)
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2004-12-15
Volume
29
Issue
24
Pages
2890
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
OpenAlex
W1996038243
Cited by
66
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Photonic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Keywords
optical waveguides, self-focusing, Bragg angle, nonlinear optics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review