The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Known-plaintext attack on optical encryption based on double random phase keys
Abstract
We demonstrate a new approach to known-plaintext attack on an optical encryption scheme based on double random phase keys. With this attack an opponent can access both random phase keys with the help of the phase retrieval technique. This demonstration shows that an optical encryption scheme based on double random encoding is vulnerable to known-plaintext attack.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Double image encryption by using iterative random binary encoding in gyrator domains
Liu, Z., Guo, Q., Xu, L., Ahmad, M. A., & Liu, S. (2010) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.18.012033 · Cited by 286
On the security of a class of diffusion mechanisms for image encryption
Zhang, L. Y., Liu, Y., Pareschi, F., Zhang, Y., Wong, K.-W., Rovatti, R., & Setti, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2682561 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, X., Zhang, P., Wei, H., & Yu, B.
- Venue
- Optics Letters
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2006-04-15
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1044
- ISSN
- 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4794
- OpenAlex
- W2009160449
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Known-plaintext attack on optical encryption based on double random phase keys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ol.31.001044
- The paper
- Peng, X., Zhang, P., Wei, H., & Yu, B. (2006). Known-plaintext attack on optical encryption based on double random phase keys. Optics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.31.001044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
