Cited by 40Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsTerahertz technology and applicationsPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics

Petahertz-scale nonlinear photoconductive sampling in air

Open access
Zimin, Dmitry, Weidman, Matthew, Schötz, Johannes, Kling, Matthias F., Yakovlev, Vladislav S., Krausz, Ferenc, Karpowicz, Nicholas·2021·Optica

Abstract

The electric field waveform of a light field can be used to unlock a detailed recording of its interaction with matter, but accessing it requires a measurement with subfemtosecond temporal resolution. We demonstrate nonlinear photoconductive sampling of light fields at optical frequencies in ambient air. The resulting detection method provides broadband electric field measurement in an inexpensive setup using a self-healing medium. A direct comparison is made between detection in air and in quartz, validating the technique up to 0.7 PHz. This provides both a simple route toward field metrology and a new platform for future studies in attosecond physics without the need for complex vacuum setups or sophisticated sample preparation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.411434

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The approaches summarised here are equally applicable to mid-infrared and visible time-domain spectroscopic methods that use electro-optic sampling (or similar approaches) to uncover the electric field of light pulses.

    “Although we presented and validated our methods using data from THz time-domain spectroscopy, the approaches summarised here are equally applicable to mid-infrared and visible time-domain spectroscopic methods that use electro-optic sampling (or similar approaches) to uncover the electric field of light pulses [2-4].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 40

Authors
Zimin, D., Weidman, M., Schötz, J., Kling, M. F., Yakovlev, V. S., Krausz, F., & Karpowicz, N.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
  • Istituto di Nanotecnologia (IT)
Venue
Optica
Published
2021-04-26
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
586
ISSN
2334-2536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134844857
Cited by
40
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optica (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Tecnopolo di Nanotecnologia e Fotonica per la medicina di precisione (TECNOMED)—FISR/MIUR-CNR: (CIPE n.3449 del 7-08-2017, CUP: B83B17000010001)
  • Technomed Puglia (CUP: B84I18000540002, DGR n.2117 del 21/11/2018)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (OSR-2016-CRG5-2995)
  • Laserlab-Europe (EU-H2020 654148)
  • European Research Council (FETopen PetaCOM)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-14-1-0389, FA9550-16-1-0073, FA9550-16-1-0156)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KL-1439/11-1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Keywords
quartz comparison, attosecond science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review