Cited by 299Photonic and Optical DevicesSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices3D IC and TSV technologies

Hybrid integration of silicon photonics circuits and InP lasers by photonic wire bonding

Open access
Billah, Muhammad Rodlin, Blaicher, Matthias, Hoose, Tobias, Dietrich, Philipp-Immanuel, Marin-Palomo, Pablo, Lindenmann, Nicole, Nesic, Aleksandar, Hofmann, Andreas +5 more·2018·Optica

Abstract

Efficient coupling of III-V light sources to silicon photonic circuits is one of the key challenges of integrated optics. Important requirements are low coupling losses, as well as small footprint and high yield of the overall assembly, along with the ability to use automated processes for large-scale production. In this paper, we demonstrate that photonic wire bonding addresses these challenges by exploiting direct-write two-photon lithography for in-situ fabrication of three-dimensional freeform waveguides between optical chips. In a series proof-of-concept experiments, we connect InP-based horizontal-cavity surface emitting lasers (HCSEL) to passive silicon photonic circuits with insertion losses down to 0.4 dB. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most efficient interface between an InP light source and a silicon photonic chip that has so far been demonstrated. Our experiments represent a key step in advancing photonic wire bonding to a universal integration platform for hybrid photonic multi-chip assemblies that combine known-good dies of different materials to high-performance hybrid multi-chip modules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.5.000876

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other 2.5D techniques include using butt coupling or photonic wire bonding to enable relaxed alignment tolerances.

    “Other 2.5D techniques include using butt coupling98 or photonic wire bonding99 to enable relaxed alignment tolerances (Fig. 3c).”

    From Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics (2024) · cites this paper as [99]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Billah, M. R., Blaicher, M., Hoose, T., Dietrich, P.-I., Marin-Palomo, P., Lindenmann, N., Nesic, A., Hofmann, A., Troppenz, U., Moehrle, M., Randel, S., Freude, W., & Koos, C.
Venue
Optica
Published
2018-07-18
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
876
ISSN
2334-2536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785482895
Cited by
299
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optica (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • KITopen (other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › 3D IC and TSV technologies
Keywords
photonic wire bonding, hybrid silicon photonics, InP lasers, two-photon lithography, multichip modules, known good die, coupling loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review