Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 824

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Standards for Reporting the Optical Aberrations of Eyes

Thibos, Larry N., Applegate, Raymond A., Schwiegerling, James T., Webb, Robert, VSIA Standards Taskforce Members·2000·Vision Science and its Applications

Abstract

In response to a perceived need in the vision community, an OSA taskforce was formed at the 1999 topical meeting on vision science and its applications (VSIA-99) and charged with developing consensus recommendations on definitions, conventions, and standards for reporting of optical aberrations of human eyes. Progress reports were presented at the 1999 OSA annual meeting and at VSIA-2000 by the chairs of three taskforce subcommittees on (1) reference axes, (2) describing functions, and (3) model eyes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/vsia.2000.suc1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 824

Metadata

Authors
Thibos, L. N., Applegate, R. A., Schwiegerling, J. T., Webb, R., & Members, V. S. T.
Venue
Vision Science and its Applications
Publisher
OSA
Published
2000
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
SuC1
OpenAlex
W1543584936
Cited by
824
References
0
FWCI
264.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standards for Reporting the Optical Aberrations of Eyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/vsia.2000.suc1
The paper
Thibos, L. N., Applegate, R. A., Schwiegerling, J. T., Webb, R., & Members, V. S. T. (2000). Standards for Reporting the Optical Aberrations of Eyes. Vision Science and its Applications. https://doi.org/10.1364/vsia.2000.suc1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.