CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare StudiesInformation and Cyber SecuritySecurity, Politics, and Digital Transformation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cyber governance studies in ensuring cybersecurity: an overview of cybersecurity governance

Open access
Savaş, Serkan, Karataş, Süleyman·2022·International Cybersecurity Law Review
DOI 10.1365/s43439-021-00045-4PMC PMC8750646
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

With the exponential increase of digital data in cyber environments, security measures have gained more importance. Cybersecurity threats are revealed by national and international units, and the number of these threats is increasing daily. The elimination of cybersecurity risks is possible with an effective cybersecurity strategy. Since the concept of management is not sufficient, the implementation of this strategy is possible with cyber governance, which includes all stakeholders in the management processes. This study emphasizes the importance and necessity of cyber governance in ensuring cybersecurity. The research and results for cybersecurity governance have been examined. A descriptive research model was used to this end. In terms of research philosophy, a basic research model and a documentary research model have been created with regard to the application method. The universe of the research consists of studies obtained from Web of Science, EBSCO, Scopus, Google Scholar, and TR Index. Studies from the last 5 years have been downloaded with the determined keywords. The result showed that although there are studies that produce local solutions for cybersecurity governance in different countries, a general governance framework has not been established as yet. On the contrary, there is a latent struggle to retain the management of this area, not its governance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1365/s43439-021-00045-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Akyeşilmen N (2018) Cyber good governance: a new challenge in international power politics? Siber Polit Derg 3(5, 6):2–21 (http://cyberpolitikjournal.org/index.php/main/article/view/37)
  2. Al-Tahat S, Moneim OA (2020) The impact of artificial intelligence on the correct application of cyber governance in Jordanian commercial banks. Int J Sci Technol Res 9(3):7138–7144
  3. Aldemir C, Kaya M (2020) Bilgi Toplumu, Siber Güvenlik ve Türkiye Uygulamaları. Kamu Yönetimi Polit Derg 1(1):6–27 (https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kaypod/issue/56116/726431)
  4. Ali OAM, Matarneh AJ, Almalkawi A, Mohamed H (2020) The impact of cyber governance in reducing the risk of cloud accounting in Jordanian commercial banks-from the perspective of Jordanian auditing firms. Mod Appl Sci 14(3):75–89. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v14n3p75 · DOI
  5. Alkan M (2012) Siber Güvenlik ve Siber Savaşlar: Bilgi Güvenliği Derneği TBMM İnternet Komisyonu Sunumu. T. İ. Komisyonu,
  6. Altıner M, Çakır F (2017) Siber Uzay ve Uluslar Arası İlişkiler/Teorisi. Cyberpolitik J 2(3):180–187
  7. Ataay F (2006) Türkiye’de yönetişim ve “sivil toplum” tartışmaları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim 1(1):121–140
  8. Bayrak S (2018) Büyük güçlerin siber yönetişim mücadelesi. Cyberpolitik J 3(5,6):47–60
  9. Başkanlığı ABDİD (2003) İyi yönetişimin temel unsurları. T.C. Maliye Bakanlığı,
  10. Boeke S (2018) National cyber crisis management: different European approaches. Governance 31(3):449–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12309 · DOI
  11. Bozkurt Ö, Ergun T, Sezen S (1998) Kamu Yönetimi Sözlüğü. TODAİE Yayınları,
  12. de Bruin R, von Solms SH (2015) Modelling cyber security governance maturity. 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). · DOI
  13. Bıçakcı S (2014) NATO’nun gelişen tehdit algısı: 21. yüzyılda siber güvenlik. Uluslararası İlişkiler Derg 10(40):100–130
  14. Carrapico H, Barrinha A (2018) European Union cyber security as an emerging research and policy field. Eur Polit Soc 19(3):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2018.1430712 · DOI
  15. Center NCIR (2014) Basic Information on Cyber Security. U.-TRCERT,
  16. Christensen KK, Liebetrau T (2019) A new role for ‘the public’? Exploring cyber security controversies in the case of WannaCry. Intell Natl Secur 34(3):395–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2019.1553704 · DOI
  17. Claver A (2018) Governance of cyber warfare in the Netherlands: an exploratory investigation. Int J Intell Secur Public Aff 20(2):155–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800992.2018.1484235 · DOI
  18. Cope S, Leishman F, Starie P (1997) Globalization, new public management and the enabling state: futures of police management. Intl Jnl Public Sec Management 10(6):444–460 · DOI
  19. Cuihong C (2018a) China and global cyber governance: main principles and debates. Asian Perspect 42(4):647–662 · DOI
  20. Cuihong C (2018b) Global cyber governance: China’s contribution and approach. China Q Int Strateg Stud 04(01):55–76. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740018500069 · DOI
  21. Doğru M (2016) Siber Harekatın Uluslararası Hukuk Çerçevesinde Analizi XVIII. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, Aydın (https://ab.org.tr/ab16/bildiri/106.pdf)
  22. Dülger MV (2004) Avrupa Konseyi ve Avrupa Birliği Düzenlemelerinde Çocuk Pornografisinin İnternet Aracılığıyla Yayılmasına Karşı Yapılan Düzenlemeler. İstanbul Barosu Derg 4:95–103
  23. Efe A (2016) Bilişim Hukuku Alanındaki Sorunlar ve Risklerin Mevzuat Boyutuyla Analiz ve Çözümlemesi. Türk Noterler Birligi Hukuk Derg 3(1):175–209
  24. Efe A, Bensghir KT (2019) Siber Güvenlik İçin Siber Yönetişim. In: Siber Güvenlik ve Savunma Problemler ve Çözümler. Grafiker Yayınları, , pp 325–378
  25. Eldem T (2020) The governance of Turkey’s cyberspace: between cyber security and information security. Int J Public Adm 43(5):452–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1680689 · DOI
  26. Eryılmaz B (2000) Kamu Yönetimi (Vol. İstanbul)
  27. Fierro P, Aroca P, Navia P (2020) How people access the internet and the democratic divide: Evidence from the Chilean region of Valparaiso 2017, 2018 and 2019. Technol Soc 63:101432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101432 · DOI
  28. Fliegauf MT (2016) In cyber (governance) we trust. Glob Policy 7(1):79–82 · DOI
  29. Greiman V (2015) Cybersecurity and Global Governance. J Inf Warf 14(4):1–14
  30. Güler B (2019) Siber Etik 4.0: İnsanlığa Değerlerle Hizmet Etmek. Cyberpolitik J 4(8):305–315
  31. Güler A, Arkın AK (2019) Siber Hijyenin Sağlanmasında İç Denetimin Rolü. Denetişim 9(19):17–40
  32. Hacimahmud AV, Mishchenko O, Kharkov VH, Soklakova T (2017) Moral cyber-social computing for state and university. 2017 IEEE East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS). · DOI
  33. Henriksen A (2019) The end of the road for the UN GGE process: the future regulation of cyberspace. J Cybersecur 5(1):tyy9. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyy009 · DOI
  34. Hitt ME (2005) Management. Prentice Hall Inc,
  35. Jayawardane S, Larik J, Jackson E (2015) Cyber governance: Challenges, solutions and lessons for effective global governance
  36. Kahraman S, Kutlu Ö, Dinçer S (2019) Avrupa Birliği’ne Uyum Sürecinde Türkiye’nin Siber Güvenlik Politikalarının Analizi. In: ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, pp 1–14
  37. Keil M, Culnan M, Dinev T, Xu H (2019) Data governance, consumer privacy, and project status reporting: Remembering H. Jeff smith. Inf Syst Front 21(6):1207–1212 · DOI
  38. Kikuchi M, Okubo T (2019) Cyber governance complex in firms. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Control and Computer Vision. · DOI
  39. Lam J (2016) IIET: Cyber security in modern power systems—Protecting large and complex networks. IET Cyber Secur Mod Power Syst. https://doi.org/10.1049/ic.2016.0044 · DOI
  40. Lei H (2019) Modern information warfare: analysis and policy recommendations. Foresight 21(4):508–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-06-2018-0064 · DOI
  41. Liaropoulos A (2015) A human-centric approach to cybersecurity: securing the human in the era of cyberphobia. J Inf Warf 14(4):15–24
  42. Liaropoulos AN (2017) Cyberspace governance and state sovereignty. In: Democracy and an open-economy world order. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 25–35 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52168-8_2 · DOI
  43. Machado MN (2015) Cyber Security Governance: Securing the European Union’s Cyber Domain. L. U. F. o. G. a. G. Affairs,
  44. Mačák K (2016) Is the international law of cyber security in crisis? 2016 8th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon)..
  45. Menacho VSJ, Martin A (2018) Cyber governance and the financial services sector: the role of public-private partnerships
  46. Min K‑S, Chai S‑W, Han M (2015) An international comparative study on cyber security strategy. Int J Secur Its Appl 9(2):13–20. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsia.2015.9.2.02 · DOI
  47. Nocetti J (2015) Contest and conquest: Russia and global internet governance. Int Affairs 91(1):111–130 · DOI
  48. Önok M (2013) Avrupa Konseyi Siber Suç Sözleşmesi Işığında Siber Suçlarla Mücadelede Uluslararası İşbirliği. Marmara Univ Hukuk Fak Hukuk Arastirmalari Derg 19(2):1229–1270
  49. Öztürk C (2019) Demokrasiyi Hacklemek: Siber Demokrasi Araçları. Electron Turk Stud. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.22957 · DOI
  50. Perumal S, Pitchay SA, Samy GN, Shanmugam B, Magalingam P, Albakri SH (2018) Transformative cyber security model for Malaysian government agencies. Int J Eng Technol 7(4.15):87–92. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.21377 · DOI
  51. Pontbriand K (2020) Distributed authority as a guiding set of principles for transnational cyber security governance. International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security.
  52. Raymond M (2016) Managing decentralized cyber governance: the responsibility to troubleshoot. Strateg Stud Q 10(4):123–149
  53. Renaud K, Von Solms B, Von Solms R (2019) How does intellectual capital align with cyber security? JIC 20(5):621–641. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-04-2019-0079 · DOI
  54. Ribeiro SLMR (2019) How Cyber Governance Influences Relationships Between Companies. Doctoral. NOVA Information Management School, Lisboa
  55. Rondelez R (2018) Governing cyber security through networks: an analysis of cyber security coordination in Belgium. Int J Cyber Criminol 12(1):300–315. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1467929 · DOI
  56. Sabillon R, Cavaller V, Cano J (2016) National cyber security strategies: global trends in cyberspace. Int J Comput Sci Softw Eng 5(5):67–81
  57. Savaş S, Topaloğlu N (2019) Data analysis through social media according to the classified crime. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 27(1):407–420. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1712-17 · DOI
  58. Savaş S, Topaloğlu N, Güler O (2015) Türkiye’deki Kullanıcıların Bazı Alan Adları Üzerine Tercihlerinin Belirlenmesi: Bir Anket Uygulaması. Bilisim Teknol Derg 8(2):51. https://doi.org/10.17671/btd.20505 · DOI
  59. Söker Ç (2018) Disiplinlerarası Bir Yaklaşımla: Siber Politika & Siber Güvenlik. Cyberpolitik J 3(5, 6):140–143
  60. Spremić M, Šimunic A (2018) Cyber security challenges in digital economy. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering.
  61. Tatar U, Karabacak B, Gheorghe A (2016) An assessment model to improve national cyber security governance. 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security: ICCWS2016.
  62. Tekeli İ (1996) Yönetim Kavramı Yanısıra Yönetişim Kavramının Gelişmesinin Nedenleri Üzerine. Sosyal Demokr Degisim 3:45–54
  63. Thuraisingham B (2019) Cyber Security and Data Governance Roles and Responsibilities at the C‑Level and the Board. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI). · DOI
  64. Turianskyi Y (2020) Africa and Europe: cyber governance lessons. Policy Insights 77:1–13
  65. Vinnakota T (2016) A second order cybernetic model for governance of cyber security in enterprises. 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC). · DOI
  66. Von Solms B (2016) Towards a cyber governance maturity model for boards of directors. Bus Manag Rev 7(4):26–33
  67. Walker-Munro B (2020) Cyber-governance, systemic governance and disruption of the criminal law. U Queensland LJ 39(2):225–252. https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v39i2.5023 · DOI
  68. Wang C, Cheng L, Pei J (2020) Exploring the cyber governance discourse: a perspective from China. Int J Leg Discours 5(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2020-2025 · DOI
  69. Wenhong X (2020) Challenges to cyber sovereignty and response measures. Mirovaia Ekon Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia 64(2):89–99
  70. Whyte C (2018) Crossing the digital divide: Monism, dualism and the reason collective action is critical for cyber theory production. Polit Gov 6(2):73–82. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i2.1338 · DOI
  71. Xinmin M (2016) Key issues and future development of international cyberspace law. China Q Int Strateg Stud 2(01):119–133. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740016500068 · DOI
  72. Zeng J, Stevens T, Chen Y (2017) China’s solution to global cyber governance: unpacking the domestic discourse of “Internet sovereignty”. Polit Policy 45(3):432–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12202 · DOI
  73. Zhou H (2019) Strategic stability in Cyberspace: a Chinese view. China Q Int Strateg Stud 5(01):81–95. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740019500088 · DOI
  74. Çelik S (2018) Siber Uzay ve Siber Güvenliğe Multidisipliner Bir Yaklaşim. Acad Rev Humanit Soc Sci 1(2):110–119

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 130

Metadata

Authors
Savaş, S., & Karataş, S.
Affiliations
Çankırı Karatekin University (TR)
Corresponding author
Savaş, Serkan
ORCID
Venue
International Cybersecurity Law Review
Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
Published
2022-01-11
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
7-34
ISSN
  • 2662-9720 (ISSN-L)
  • 2662-9739
DOI
10.1365/s43439-021-00045-4
PMC
PMC8750646
OpenAlex
W4206517825
Cited by
130
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
40.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Cybersecurity Law Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Keywords
cyberspace governance, cybersecurity governance, cybersecurity strategy, cyber threats, cyber risk management, governance framework, stakeholder management, cybersecurity management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review