The DOI matches its Crossref record.
π* ← π Shakeup Satellites for the Analysis of Structure and Bonding in Aromatic Polymers by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Abstract
The applications of ESCA to polymer surface analysis include the use of the secondary final-state effects which lead to satellite structure near the core-level photoemission (PE) lines. Specifically, unsaturated and aromatic functionalities in organic compounds and polymers lead to π* ← π shakeup peaks of less than 10 eV lower kinetic energy (higher binding energy). In the surface analysis of polymers, these features can be utilized for qualitative analysis, identification of the presence and structure of aromatic bonding, and quantitative analysis in determining the amount of a particular block or the aromatic containing function in the near-surface region. Carbon Is shakeups are most often used, but the present study includes detailed qualitative and quantitative analysis of shakeup structures from PE lines from each type of atom in hydrocarbon-, siloxane-, and sulfur-containing polymers. These results show the importance of including the shakeup intensity in quantitative peak area calculations and in peak fitting of complex PE envelopes. These studies prove in a variety of systems that the effects of third-row atoms on the final state lead to the presence of shakeup features in atoms with orbitals which do not participate in the aromatic orbital initial state, thus complicating interpretation of structure from the presence of these features. Results from the siloxane and sulfone polymers indicate that previously held assumptions about the nature of the initial-state molecular orbital may overlook the contribution of empty 3d orbitals or increased charge density on the Si or S atom which would spread the pi orbitals to the oxygen in the aromatic siloxane or sulfone systems. Finally, analysis of these features can provide quantitative analysis of polymeric surface structure by monitoring the relative intensity of the feature to the main PE line.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhu, B.-J., Yu, X.-Y., Jia, Y., Peng, F.-M., Sun, B., Zhang, M.-Y., Luo, T., Liu, J.-H., & Huang, X.-J. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp212514a · Cited by 353
Electrical conductivity of thermal carbon blacks
Pantea, D., Darmstadt, H., Kaliaguine, S., Sümmchen, L., & Roy, C. (2001) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/s0008-6223(00)00239-6 · Cited by 347
Direct determination and quantification of sulphur forms in heavy petroleum and coals
Kelemen, S. R., George, G. N., & Gorbaty, M. L. (1990) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/0016-2361(90)90001-7 · Cited by 297
Kim, J., Yi, Y., Peck, D.-H., Yoon, S.-H., Jung, D.-H., & Park, H. S. (2019) · Environmental Science: Nano · doi:10.1039/c8en01181h · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardella, J. A., Ferguson, S. A., & Chin, R. L.
- Venue
- Applied Spectroscopy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 224-232
- ISSN
- 0003-7028 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3530
- OpenAlex
- W2023242854
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: π* ← π Shakeup Satellites for the Analysis of Structure and Bonding in Aromatic Polymers by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1366/0003702864509565
- The paper
- Gardella, J. A., Ferguson, S. A., & Chin, R. L. (1986). π* ← π Shakeup Satellites for the Analysis of Structure and Bonding in Aromatic Polymers by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702864509565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.