The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validating the 8 CPCSSN Case Definitions for Chronic Disease Surveillance in a Primary Care Database of Electronic Health Records
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) is Canada's first national chronic disease surveillance system based on electronic health record (EHR) data. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate case definitions and case-finding algorithms used to identify 8 common chronic conditions in primary care: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, depression, diabetes, hypertension, osteoarthritis, parkinsonism, and epilepsy. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional data validation study design, regional and local CPCSSN networks from British Columbia, Alberta (2), Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland participated in validating EHR case-finding algorithms. A random sample of EHR charts were reviewed, oversampling for patients older than 60 years and for those with epilepsy or parkinsonism. Charts were reviewed by trained research assistants and residents who were blinded to the algorithmic diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPVs, NPVs) were calculated. RESULTS: We obtained data from 1,920 charts from 4 different EHR systems (Wolf, Med Access, Nightingale, and PS Suite). For the total sample, sensitivity ranged from 78% (osteoarthritis) to more than 95% (diabetes, epilepsy, and parkinsonism); specificity was greater than 94% for all diseases; PPV ranged from 72% (dementia) to 93% (hypertension); NPV ranged from 86% (hypertension) to greater than 99% (diabetes, dementia, epilepsy, and parkinsonism). CONCLUSIONS: The CPCSSN diagnostic algorithms showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for hypertension, diabetes, epilepsy, and parkinsonism and acceptable values for the other conditions. CPCSSN data are appropriate for use in public health surveillance, primary care, and health services research, as well as to inform policy for these diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review
Herrett, E., Thomas, S. L., Schoonen, W. M., Smeeth, L., & Hall, A. J. (2010) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03537.x · Cited by 1,109
Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data
Quan, H., Khan, N., Hemmelgarn, B. R., Tu, K., Chen, G., Campbell, N., Hill, M. D., Ghali, W. A., & McAlister, F. A. (2009) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.139279 · Cited by 350
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice
Hassey, A., Gerrett, D., & Wilson, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1401 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Jaakkimainen, R. L., Bronskill, S. E., Tierney, M. C., Herrmann, N., Green, D., Young, J., Ivers, N., Butt, D., Widdifield, J., & Tu, K. (2016) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160105 · Cited by 305
Psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy.
Josephson, C. B., & Jetté, N. (2017) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2017.1302412 · Cited by 224
Ehsani-Moghaddam, B., Martin, K., & Queenan, J. A. (2021) · Health Information Management Journal · doi:10.1177/1833358319887743 · Cited by 84
Weisman, A., Brown, R., Chu, L., Aronson, R., & Perkins, B. A. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2023.09.001 · Cited by 8
Puzhko, S., Schuster, T., Barnett, T. A., Renoux, C., Rosenberg, E., Barber, D., & Bartlett, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2020.00024 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Williamson, T., Green, M. E., Birtwhistle, R., Khan, S., Garies, S., Wong, S. T., Natarajan, N., Manca, D., & Drummond, N.
- Venue
- The Annals of Family Medicine
- Publisher
- Annals of Family Medicine
- Published
- 2014-07-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-372
- ISSN
- 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-1717
- OpenAlex
- W2168376827
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validating the 8 CPCSSN Case Definitions for Chronic Disease Surveillance in a Primary Care Database of Electronic Health Records. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1370/afm.1644
- The paper
- Williamson, T., Green, M. E., Birtwhistle, R., Khan, S., Garies, S., Wong, S. T., Natarajan, N., Manca, D., & Drummond, N. (2014). Validating the 8 CPCSSN Case Definitions for Chronic Disease Surveillance in a Primary Care Database of Electronic Health Records. The Annals of Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.