Skin diseases in family medicine: prevalence and health care use.
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Ongoing care for patients with skin diseases can be optimized by understanding the incidence and population prevalence of various skin diseases and the patient-related factors related to the use of primary, specialty, and alternative health care for these conditions. We examined the recent prevalence of skin diseases in a defined population of family medicine patients, self-reported disease-related quality of life, extent and duration of skin disease, and the use of health care by patients with skin diseases. METHODS: We undertook a morbidity registry-based epidemiological study to determine the prevalence of various skin diseases, using a patient questionnaire to inquire about health care use, within a network of family practices in the Netherlands with a practice population of approximately 12,000 citizens. RESULTS: Skin diseases accounted for 12.4% of all diseases seen by the participating family physicians. Of the 857 questionnaires sent to patients registered with a skin disease, 583 (68.0%) were returned, and 501 were suitable for analysis. In the previous year, 83.4% of the patients had contacted their family physician for their skin disease, 17.0% had contacted a medical specialist, and 5.2% had consulted an alternative health care practitioner. Overall, 65.1% contacted only their family physician. Patients who reported more severe disease and lower quality of life made more use of all forms of health care. CONCLUSION: This practice population-based study found that skin diseases account for 12.4% of diseases seen by family physicians, and that some skin problems may be seen more frequently. Although patients with more extensive skin diseases also obtain care from dermatologists, most patients have their skin diseases treated mainly by their family physician. Overall, patients with more severe disease and a lower quality of life seek more treatment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 80
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Classifi cation Committee of WONCA. ICHPPC-2-Defi ned. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.
- van de Lisdonk EH, van den Bosch WJHM, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Ziekten in de Huisartspraktijk [Diseases in Family Medicine]. Maarsen: Elsevier; 2003.
- Authors
- Verhoeven, E. W. M., Kraaimaat, F. W., van Weel, C., van de Kerkhof, P. C. M., Duller, P., van der Valk, P. G. M., van den Hoogen, H. J. M., Bor, J. H. J., Schers, H. J., & Evers, A. W. M.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Evers, A. W. M.
- Venue
- The Annals of Family Medicine
- Publisher
- Annals of Family Medicine
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-354
- ISSN
- 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-1717
- PMC
- PMC2478509
- OpenAlex
- W2142595568
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Keywords
- skin diseases, prevalence, health care utilization, general practitioners, disease severity, quality of life, alternative health care, primary care
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Family Practice, Female, Health Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Physicians, Family, Skin Diseases, Health Behavior, Incidence, Prevalence, Health Care Surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review