The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Indirect Benefits of Mating with Attractive Males Outweigh the Direct Costs
Open accessAbstract
The fitness consequences of mate choice are a source of ongoing debate in evolutionary biology. Recent theory predicts that indirect benefits of female choice due to offspring inheriting superior genes are likely to be negated when there are direct costs associated with choice, including any costs of mating with attractive males. To estimate the fitness consequences of mating with males of varying attractiveness, we housed female house crickets, Acheta domesticus, with either attractive or unattractive males and measured a variety of direct and indirect fitness components. These fitness components were combined to give relative estimates of the number of grandchildren produced and the intrinsic rate of increase (relative net fitness). We found that females mated to attractive males incur a substantial survival cost. However, these costs are cancelled out and may be outweighed by the benefits of having offspring with elevated fitness. This benefit is due predominantly, but not exclusively, to the effect of an increase in sons' attractiveness. Our results suggest that the direct costs that females experience when mating with attractive males can be outweighed by indirect benefits. They also reveal the value of estimating the net fitness consequences of a mating strategy by including measures of offspring quality in estimates of fitness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sexual selection and mate choice
Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015 · Cited by 1,258
Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory
Kempenaers, B. (2007) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(07)37005-8 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Head, M. L., Hunt, J., Jennions, M. D., & Brooks, R.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2005-01-25
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e33
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2106158700
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Indirect Benefits of Mating with Attractive Males Outweigh the Direct Costs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030033
- The paper
- Head, M. L., Hunt, J., Jennions, M. D., & Brooks, R. (2005). The Indirect Benefits of Mating with Attractive Males Outweigh the Direct Costs. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.