Cited by 225Axon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Diverse Modes of Axon Elaboration in the Developing Neocortex

Open access
Portera-Cailliau, Carlos, Weimer, Robby M, De Paola, Vincenzo, Caroni, Pico, Svoboda, Karel·2005·PLoS Biology

Abstract

The development of axonal arbors is a critical step in the establishment of precise neural circuits, but relatively little is known about the mechanisms of axonal elaboration in the neocortex. We used in vivo two-photon time-lapse microscopy to image axons in the neocortex of green fluorescent protein-transgenic mice over the first 3 wk of postnatal development. This period spans the elaboration of thalamocortical (TC) and Cajal-Retzius (CR) axons and cortical synaptogenesis. Layer 1 collaterals of TC and CR axons were imaged repeatedly over time scales ranging from minutes up to days, and their growth and pruning were analyzed. The structure and dynamics of TC and CR axons differed profoundly. Branches of TC axons terminated in small, bulbous growth cones, while CR axon branch tips had large growth cones with numerous long filopodia. TC axons grew rapidly in straight paths, with frequent interstitial branch additions, while CR axons grew more slowly along tortuous paths. For both types of axon, new branches appeared at interstitial sites along the axon shaft and did not involve growth cone splitting. Pruning occurred via retraction of small axon branches (tens of microns, at both CR and TC axons) or degeneration of large portions of the arbor (hundreds of microns, for TC axons only). The balance between growth and retraction favored overall growth, but only by a slight margin. Given the identical layer 1 territory upon which CR and TC axons grow, the differences in their structure and dynamics likely reflect distinct intrinsic growth programs for axons of long projection neurons versus local interneurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030272

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At this age, both axon types favor overall growth in the superficial cortical layers, with slightly more terminal extension than retraction.

    “At this age, both axon types favor an overall growth in the superficial cortical layers, with slightly more terminal extension than retraction [60].”

    From Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the cortex (2011) · cites this paper as [60]

  • Cajal-Retzius axons grow slowly along tortuous paths, while thalamocortical axons grow quickly and straight.

    “Cajal-Retzius axons grow slowly and follow tortuous paths, while thalamocortical axons grow quickly and straight [60].”

    From Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the cortex (2011) · cites this paper as [60]

  • During the first 3 postnatal weeks in mice, axonal growth is cell-type specific.

    “During postnatal development (i.e., the first 3 weeks in mice), it has been found that axonal growth is cell-type specific.”

    From Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the cortex (2011) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 225

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Braintenberg V Schultz A Anatomy of the cortex 1991 Berlin Springer-Verlag 249

Authors
Portera-Cailliau, C., Weimer, R. M., De Paola, V., Caroni, P., & Svoboda, K.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2005-07-26
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
e272
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2125477115
Cited by
225
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • John Merck Fund
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
neocortex development, thalamocortical connections, axon branching, axon pruning, growth cones, filopodia, synaptogenesis, interneurons, projection neurons, axonal degeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Female, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Neocortex, Growth Cones, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Multiphoton, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review