The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromosomal Distribution of PcG Proteins during Drosophila Development
Open accessAbstract
Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are able to maintain the memory of silent transcriptional states of homeotic genes throughout development. In Drosophila, they form multimeric complexes that bind to specific DNA regulatory elements named PcG response elements (PREs). To date, few PREs have been identified and the chromosomal distribution of PcG proteins during development is unknown. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with genomic tiling path microarrays to analyze the binding profile of the PcG proteins Polycomb (PC) and Polyhomeotic (PH) across 10 Mb of euchromatin. We also analyzed the distribution of GAGA factor (GAF), a sequence-specific DNA binding protein that is found at most previously identified PREs. Our data show that PC and PH often bind to clustered regions within large loci that encode transcription factors which play multiple roles in developmental patterning and in the regulation of cell proliferation. GAF co-localizes with PC and PH to a limited extent, suggesting that GAF is not a necessary component of chromatin at PREs. Finally, the chromosome-association profile of PC and PH changes during development, suggesting that the function of these proteins in the regulation of some of their target genes might be more dynamic than previously anticipated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Drosophila Fab-7 Chromosomal Element Conveys Epigenetic Inheritance during Mitosis and Meiosis
Cavalli, G., & Paro, R. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81181-2 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Cited by
Bernstein, B. E., Meissner, A., & Lander, E. S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.033 · Cited by 2,086
Polycomb silencers control cell fate, development and cancer
Sparmann, A., & van Lohuizen, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1991 · Cited by 1,303
Systematic Protein Location Mapping Reveals Five Principal Chromatin Types in Drosophila Cells
Filion, G. J., van Bemmel, J. G., Braunschweig, U., Talhout, W., Kind, J., Ward, L. D., Brugman, W., de Castro, I. J., Kerkhoven, R. M., Bussemaker, H. J., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.009 · Cited by 964
Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes
Dowen, J. M., Fan, Z. P., Hnisz, D., Ren, G., Abraham, B. J., Zhang, L. N., Weintraub, A. S., Schuijers, J., Lee, T. I., Zhao, K., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.030 · Cited by 884
Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes
Schwartz, Y. B., & Pirrotta, V. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1981 · Cited by 868
Metadata
- Authors
- Nègre, N., Hennetin, J., Sun, L. V., Lavrov, S., Bellis, M., White, K. P., & Cavalli, G.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006-04-20
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e170
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2092476087
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.