Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing Evidence for a Pervasive Alteration in Tropical Tree Communities

Open access
Chave, Jérôme, Condit, Richard, Muller-Landau, Helene C, Thomas, Sean C, Ashton, Peter S, Bunyavejchewin, Sarayudh, Co, Leonardo L, Dattaraja, Handanakere S, Davies, Stuart J, Esufali, Shameema, Ewango, Corneille E. N, Feeley, Kenneth J, Foster, Robin B, Gunatilleke, Nimal, Gunatilleke, Savitri, Hall, Pamela, Hart, Terese B, Hernández, Consuelo, Hubbell, Stephen P, Itoh, Akira, Kiratiprayoon, Somboon, LaFrankie, James V, Loo de Lao, Suzanne, Makana, Jean-Rémy, Noor, Md. Nur Supardi, Kassim, Abdul Rahman, Samper, Cristián, Sukumar, Raman, Suresh, Hebbalalu S, Tan, Sylvester, Thompson, Jill, Tongco, Ma. Dolores C, Valencia, Renato, Vallejo, Martha, Villa, Gorky, Yamakura, Takuo, Zimmerman, Jess K, Losos, Elizabeth C·2008·PLoS Biology

Abstract

In Amazonian tropical forests, recent studies have reported increases in aboveground biomass and in primary productivity, as well as shifts in plant species composition favouring fast-growing species over slow-growing ones. This pervasive alteration of mature tropical forests was attributed to global environmental change, such as an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration, nutrient deposition, temperature, drought frequency, and/or irradiance. We used standardized, repeated measurements of over 2 million trees in ten large (16-52 ha each) forest plots on three continents to evaluate the generality of these findings across tropical forests. Aboveground biomass increased at seven of our ten plots, significantly so at four plots, and showed a large decrease at a single plot. Carbon accumulation pooled across sites was significant (+0.24 MgC ha(-1) y(-1), 95% confidence intervals [0.07, 0.39] MgC ha(-1) y(-1)), but lower than reported previously for Amazonia. At three sites for which we had data for multiple census intervals, we found no concerted increase in biomass gain, in conflict with the increased productivity hypothesis. Over all ten plots, the fastest-growing quartile of species gained biomass (+0.33 [0.09, 0.55] % y(-1)) compared with the tree community as a whole (+0.15 % y(-1)); however, this significant trend was due to a single plot. Biomass of slow-growing species increased significantly when calculated over all plots (+0.21 [0.02, 0.37] % y(-1)), and in half of our plots when calculated individually. Our results do not support the hypothesis that fast-growing species are consistently increasing in dominance in tropical tree communities. Instead, they suggest that our plots may be simultaneously recovering from past disturbances and affected by changes in resource availability. More long-term studies are necessary to clarify the contribution of global change to the functioning of tropical forests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060045

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Chave, J., Condit, R., Muller-Landau, H. C., Thomas, S. C., Ashton, P. S., Bunyavejchewin, S., Co, L. L., Dattaraja, H. S., Davies, S. J., Esufali, S., Ewango, C. E. N., Feeley, K. J., Foster, R. B., Gunatilleke, N., Gunatilleke, S., Hall, P., Hart, T. B., Hernández, C., Hubbell, S. P., Itoh, A., Kiratiprayoon, S., LaFrankie, J. V., Loo de Lao, S., Makana, J.-R., Noor, M. N. S., Kassim, A. R., Samper, C., Sukumar, R., Suresh, H. S., Tan, S., Thompson, J., Tongco, M. D. C., Valencia, R., Vallejo, M., Villa, G., Yamakura, T., Zimmerman, J. K., & Losos, E. C.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2008-03-04
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
e45
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2160051745
Cited by
229
References
2
FWCI
21.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.