Cited by 58Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingEscherichia coli research studiesBiochemical and Structural Characterization

A short-time scale colloidal system reveals early bacterial adhesion dynamics

Open access
Beloin, Christophe, Houry, Ali, Froment, Manuel, Ghigo, Jean-Marc, Henry, Nelly·2008·PLoS Biology

Abstract

The development of bacteria on abiotic surfaces has important public health and sanitary consequences. However, despite several decades of study of bacterial adhesion to inert surfaces, the biophysical mechanisms governing this process remain poorly understood, due, in particular, to the lack of methodologies covering the appropriate time scale. Using micrometric colloidal surface particles and flow cytometry analysis, we developed a rapid multiparametric approach to studying early events in adhesion of the bacterium Escherichia coli. This approach simultaneously describes the kinetics and amplitude of early steps in adhesion, changes in physicochemical surface properties within the first few seconds of adhesion, and the self-association state of attached and free-floating cells. Examination of the role of three well-characterized E. coli surface adhesion factors upon attachment to colloidal surfaces--curli fimbriae, F-conjugative pilus, and Ag43 adhesin--showed clear-cut differences in the very initial phases of surface colonization for cell-bearing surface structures, all known to promote biofilm development. Our multiparametric analysis revealed a correlation in the adhesion phase with cell-to-cell aggregation properties and demonstrated that this phenomenon amplified surface colonization once initial cell-surface attachment was achieved. Monitoring of real-time physico-chemical particle surface properties showed that surface-active molecules of bacterial origin quickly modified surface properties, providing new insight into the intricate relations connecting abiotic surface physicochemical properties and bacterial adhesion. Hence, the biophysical analytical method described here provides a new and relevant approach to quantitatively and kinetically investigating bacterial adhesion and biofilm development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060167

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autoaggregation can lead to microcolony formation and biofilm in two ways: single planktonic cells attach to the substrate and recruit other cells from suspension via autoagglutinins, or cells autoaggregate in solution and the aggregates settle on the substrate to initiate biofilm formation.

    “Autoaggregation can lead to microcolony formation and biofilm in two ways (Figure 3). In the first, single planktonic cells attach to the substrate. This depends on expression of surface adhesins and possibly also motility factors [46]. Following this, these cells recruit other cells from suspension via autoagglutinins, leading to microcolony formation [75],[94].”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says early surface-bound cells could anchor cell associations and that aggregation may amplify surface colonization, supporting the proposed recruitment route. The paper does not establish that this produces microcolonies, and the cited passages do not show free-floating aggregates settling to initiate a biofilm. Its findings concern early adhesion, not both proposed routes to biofilm formation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 58

Authors
Beloin, C., Houry, A., Froment, M., Ghigo, J.-M., & Henry, N.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Henry, Nelly
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2008-07-08
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
e167
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2094049407
Cited by
58
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
bacterial adhesion, Escherichia coli, colloidal particles, surface colonization, biofilm growth, curli fimbriae, surface physicochemical properties, adhesion kinetics, flow cytometry, abiotic surfaces
MeSH terms
Bacterial Adhesion, Escherichia coli, Flow Cytometry, Kinetics, Particle Size, Surface Properties, Suspensions, Biofilms, Adhesins, Escherichia coli, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review