The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proteomics Reveals Novel Drosophila Seminal Fluid Proteins Transferred at Mating
Open accessAbstract
Across diverse taxa, seminal fluid proteins (Sfps) transferred at mating affect the reproductive success of both sexes. Such reproductive proteins often evolve under positive selection between species; because of this rapid divergence, Sfps are hypothesized to play a role in speciation by contributing to reproductive isolation between populations. In Drosophila, individual Sfps have been characterized and are known to alter male sperm competitive ability and female post-mating behavior, but a proteomic-scale view of the transferred Sfps has been missing. Here we describe a novel proteomic method that uses whole-organism isotopic labeling to detect transferred Sfps in mated female D. melanogaster. We identified 63 proteins, which were previously unknown to function in reproduction, and confirmed the transfer of dozens of predicted Sfps. Relative quantification of protein abundance revealed that several of these novel Sfps are abundant in seminal fluid. Positive selection and tandem gene duplication are the prevailing forces of Sfp evolution, and comparative proteomics with additional species revealed lineage-specific changes in seminal fluid content. We also report a proteomic-based gene discovery method that uncovered 19 previously unannotated genes in D. melanogaster. Our results demonstrate an experimental method to identify transferred proteins in any system that is amenable to isotopic labeling, and they underscore the power of combining proteomic and evolutionary analyses to shed light on the complex process of Drosophila reproduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets
Käll, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S., & MacCoss, M. J. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1113 · Cited by 2,424
Self-citationEvolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
Assigning Significance to Peptides Identified by Tandem Mass Spectrometry Using Decoy Databases
Käll, L., Storey, J. D., MacCoss, M. J., & Noble, W. S. (2008) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr700600n · Cited by 607
Self-citationSex Peptide Causes Mating Costs in Female Drosophila melanogaster
Wigby, S., & Chapman, T. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.051 · Cited by 498
Cited by
Sharkey, D. J., Tremellen, K. P., Jasper, M. J., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., & Robertson, S. A. (2012) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1102736 · Cited by 331
Quantitative Proteomics by Metabolic Labeling of Model Organisms
Gouw, J. W., Krijgsveld, J., & Heck, A. J. R. (2010) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r900001-mcp200 · Cited by 151
Oh, the places they’ll go: Female sperm storage and sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster
Schnakenberg, S. L., Siegal, M. L., & Bloch Qazi, M. C. (2012) · Spermatogenesis · doi:10.4161/spmg.21655 · Cited by 76
(2021) · doi:10.7554/elife.74005 · Cited by 21
The Origin and Evolution of Sex Peptide and Sex Peptide Receptor Interactions
Peng, J., Svetec, N., Molina, H., & Zhao, L. (2024) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae065 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Findlay, G. D., Yi, X., MacCoss, M. J., & Swanson, W. J.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-07-29
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e178
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W1969589862
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.