Cited by 164Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Accelerated Recruitment of New Brain Development Genes into the Human Genome

Open access
Zhang, Yong E., Landback, Patrick, Vibranovski, Maria D., Long, Manyuan·2011·PLoS Biology

Abstract

How the human brain evolved has attracted tremendous interests for decades. Motivated by case studies of primate-specific genes implicated in brain function, we examined whether or not the young genes, those emerging genome-wide in the lineages specific to the primates or rodents, showed distinct spatial and temporal patterns of transcription compared to old genes, which had existed before primate and rodent split. We found consistent patterns across different sources of expression data: there is a significantly larger proportion of young genes expressed in the fetal or infant brain of humans than in mouse, and more young genes in humans have expression biased toward early developing brains than old genes. Most of these young genes are expressed in the evolutionarily newest part of human brain, the neocortex. Remarkably, we also identified a number of human-specific genes which are expressed in the prefrontal cortex, which is implicated in complex cognitive behaviors. The young genes upregulated in the early developing human brain play diverse functional roles, with a significant enrichment of transcription factors. Genes originating from different mechanisms show a similar expression bias in the developing brain. Moreover, we found that the young genes upregulated in early brain development showed rapid protein evolution compared to old genes also expressed in the fetal brain. Strikingly, genes expressed in the neocortex arose soon after its morphological origin. These four lines of evidence suggest that positive selection for brain function may have contributed to the origination of young genes expressed in the developing brain. These data demonstrate a striking recruitment of new genes into the early development of the human brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001179

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 164

Authors
Zhang, Y. E., Landback, P., Vibranovski, M. D., & Long, M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Long, Manyuan
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2011-10-18
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
e1001179
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2107356238
Cited by
164
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 15
FWCI
21.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Chicago (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1051826)
  • Chicago Community Trust
  • University of Chicago
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R0IGM078070-01A1)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM078070)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
human brain evolution, gene recruitment, primate-specific genes, gene expression patterns, fetal brain development, neocortex, prefrontal cortex, transcription factors, protein evolution, positive selection, human-specific genes
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Selection, Genetic, Up-Regulation, Genome, Human, Synteny, Mice, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review