Spatial embedding and wiring cost constrain the functional layout of the cortical network of rodents and primates
Open accessAbstract
Mammals show a wide range of brain sizes, reflecting adaptation to diverse habitats. Comparing interareal cortical networks across brains of different sizes and mammalian orders provides robust information on evolutionarily preserved features and species-specific processing modalities. However, these networks are spatially embedded, directed, and weighted, making comparisons challenging. Using tract tracing data from macaque and mouse, we show the existence of a general organizational principle based on an exponential distance rule (EDR) and cortical geometry, enabling network comparisons within the same model framework. These comparisons reveal the existence of network invariants between mouse and macaque, exemplified in graph motif profiles and connection similarity indices, but also significant differences, such as fractionally smaller and much weaker long-distance connections in the macaque than in mouse. The latter lends credence to the prediction that long-distance cortico-cortical connections could be very weak in the much-expanded human cortex, implying an increased susceptibility to disconnection syndromes such as Alzheimer disease and schizophrenia. Finally, our data from tracer experiments involving only gray matter connections in the primary visual areas of both species show that an EDR holds at local scales as well (within 1.5 mm), supporting the hypothesis that it is a universally valid property across all scales and, possibly, across the mammalian class.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a true falloff of both structural and functional connectivity with distance in a number of mammalian species.
“true falloff of both structural and functional connectivity with distance has been shown with high-resolution invasive imaging as well as tractography in a number of mammalian species (Horvát et al., 2016; Markov et al., 2013; Perinelli et al., 2019; Roberts et al., 2016; Rubinov et al., 2015; Supekar et al., 2009).”
From The role of spatial embedding in mouse brain networks constructed from diffusion tractography and tracer injections (2021) · cites this paper as Horvát et al., 2016
The Results (‘Functional Layout in Terms of Spatial Clustering of Cortical Areas’; page unavailable) report that connection probability and strength decline with distance in mouse and macaque, using tract-tracing data. The paper does not show a corresponding falloff in functional connectivity; ‘functional layout’ refers here to the organization of the traced cortical network. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes limitations of tractography rather than presenting it as a method used to establish these findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe brain is a spatially embedded network with properties partially inherited from geometry.
“the brain is itself a spatially embedded network with properties partially inherited from geometry: there is a metabolic wiring cost in the establishment of long-range connections”
From The role of spatial embedding in mouse brain networks constructed from diffusion tractography and tracer injections (2021) · cites this paper as Horvát et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 198
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [1]Sporns O. Networks of the brain. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2011.
- Authors
- Horvát, S., Gămănuț, R., Ercsey-Ravasz, M., Magrou, L., Gămănuț, B., Van Essen, D. C., Burkhalter, A., Knoblauch, K., Toroczkai, Z., & Kennedy, H.
- Affiliations
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ercsey-Ravasz, Mária
- Toroczkai, Zoltán
- Kennedy, Henry
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-07-21
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1002512
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- PMC
- PMC4956175
- OpenAlex
- W2490286622
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (vor)
- Locations
- PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-BSV4-501 (CORE-NETS), ANR-14-CE13-0033 (ARCHI-CORE), ANR-15-CE32-0016 (CORNET), LabEx CORTEX (ANR-11-LABX-0042) of Université de Lyon, within the program “Investissements d’Avenir” (ANR-11-IDEX-0007), “Programme Avenir Lyon Saint-Etienne” of the Université de Lyon (ANR-11-IDEX-0007), within the Program "Investissements d'Avenir" operated by the French National Research Agency (ANR))
- Seventh Framework Programme (PCOFUND-GA-2013-609102 (Marie Curie Program))
- Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai (GSCE-30260-2015 “Grant for Supporting Excellent Research”)
- National Institutes of Health (NIH R01-MH-60974, NIH ROI EY016184)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-12-1-0405 (AFOSR and DARPA))
- Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA-1-09-1-0039)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- corticocortical connections, long-distance connections, spatial embedding, wiring cost, graph motifs, macaque, mice, primary visual cortex, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, disconnection syndrome, human cortex
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Macaca, Male, Models, Anatomic, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Species Specificity, Mice, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review