Cited by 118Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationCellular Mechanics and InteractionsHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ

An alternative mode of epithelial polarity in the Drosophila midgut

Open access
Chen, Jia, Sayadian, Aram-Christopher, Lowe, Nick, Lovegrove, Holly E., St Johnston, Daniel·2018·PLOS Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Apical-basal polarity is essential for the formation and function of epithelial tissues, whereas loss of polarity is a hallmark of tumours. Studies in Drosophila have identified conserved polarity factors that define the apical (Crumbs, Stardust, Par-6, atypical protein kinase C [aPKC]), junctional (Bazooka [Baz]/Par-3), and basolateral (Scribbled [Scrib], Discs large [Dlg], Lethal [2] giant larvae [Lgl]) domains of epithelial cells. Because these conserved factors mark equivalent domains in diverse types of vertebrate and invertebrate epithelia, it is generally assumed that this system underlies polarity in all epithelia. Here, we show that this is not the case, as none of these canonical factors are required for the polarisation of the endodermal epithelium of the Drosophila adult midgut. Furthermore, like vertebrate epithelia but not other Drosophila epithelia, the midgut epithelium forms occluding junctions above adherens junctions (AJs) and requires the integrin adhesion complex for polarity. Thus, Drosophila contains two types of epithelia that polarise by fundamentally different mechanisms. This diversity of epithelial types may reflect their different developmental origins, junctional arrangement, or whether they polarise in an apical-basal direction or vice versa. Since knock-outs of canonical polarity factors in vertebrates often have little or no effect on epithelial polarity and the Drosophila midgut shares several common features with vertebrate epithelia, this diversity of polarity mechanisms is likely to be conserved in other animals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000041

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Drosophila adult midgut, although Scribble and Dlg localize to the septate junctions, they are not required for apical basal polarity or for septate junction maintenance.

    “In a final Drosophila tissue, the adult midgut, although Scribble and Dlg localize to the septate junctions, they are not required for apical basal polarity or for septate junction maintenance (Chen et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 118

Authors
Chen, J., Sayadian, A.-C., Lowe, N., Lovegrove, H. E., & St Johnston, D.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2018-10-19
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
e3000041
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2799242296
Cited by
118
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (080007, 207496, 092096, 203144, 083348)
  • Cancer Research UK (A14492, A24823)
  • Royal Society K.C. Wong Postdoctoral Fellowship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Keywords
epithelial polarity, apical-basal polarity, Drosophila midgut, endodermal epithelium, tight junctions, adherens junctions, integrin adhesion complexes, Crumbs, stardust, Par6, atypical protein kinase C, Discs large
MeSH terms
Animals, Digestive System, Drosophila melanogaster, Epithelial Cells, Epithelium, Female, Intercellular Junctions, Models, Biological, Cell Polarity, Genes, Insect, Body Patterning, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review