An alternative mode of epithelial polarity in the Drosophila midgut
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Apical-basal polarity is essential for the formation and function of epithelial tissues, whereas loss of polarity is a hallmark of tumours. Studies in Drosophila have identified conserved polarity factors that define the apical (Crumbs, Stardust, Par-6, atypical protein kinase C [aPKC]), junctional (Bazooka [Baz]/Par-3), and basolateral (Scribbled [Scrib], Discs large [Dlg], Lethal [2] giant larvae [Lgl]) domains of epithelial cells. Because these conserved factors mark equivalent domains in diverse types of vertebrate and invertebrate epithelia, it is generally assumed that this system underlies polarity in all epithelia. Here, we show that this is not the case, as none of these canonical factors are required for the polarisation of the endodermal epithelium of the Drosophila adult midgut. Furthermore, like vertebrate epithelia but not other Drosophila epithelia, the midgut epithelium forms occluding junctions above adherens junctions (AJs) and requires the integrin adhesion complex for polarity. Thus, Drosophila contains two types of epithelia that polarise by fundamentally different mechanisms. This diversity of epithelial types may reflect their different developmental origins, junctional arrangement, or whether they polarise in an apical-basal direction or vice versa. Since knock-outs of canonical polarity factors in vertebrates often have little or no effect on epithelial polarity and the Drosophila midgut shares several common features with vertebrate epithelia, this diversity of polarity mechanisms is likely to be conserved in other animals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Drosophila adult midgut, although Scribble and Dlg localize to the septate junctions, they are not required for apical basal polarity or for septate junction maintenance.
“In a final Drosophila tissue, the adult midgut, although Scribble and Dlg localize to the septate junctions, they are not required for apical basal polarity or for septate junction maintenance (Chen et al., 2018).”
From Scribble: A master scaffold in polarity, adhesion, synaptogenesis, and proliferation (2019) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Chen, J., Sayadian, A.-C., Lowe, N., Lovegrove, H. E., & St Johnston, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- PLOS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2018-10-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e3000041
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- PMC
- PMC6209374
- OpenAlex
- W2799242296
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2018-10-31)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (080007, 207496, 092096, 203144, 083348)
- Cancer Research UK (A14492, A24823)
- Royal Society K.C. Wong Postdoctoral Fellowship
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
- Keywords
- epithelial polarity, apical-basal polarity, Drosophila midgut, endodermal epithelium, tight junctions, adherens junctions, integrin adhesion complexes, Crumbs, stardust, Par6, atypical protein kinase C, Discs large
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Digestive System, Drosophila melanogaster, Epithelial Cells, Epithelium, Female, Intercellular Junctions, Models, Biological, Cell Polarity, Genes, Insect, Body Patterning, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review