mRNA stability fine-tunes gene expression in the developing cortex to control neurogenesis
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
RNA abundance is controlled by rates of synthesis and degradation. Although mis-regulation of RNA turnover is linked to neurodevelopmental disorders, how it contributes to cortical development is largely unknown. Here, we discover the landscape of RNA stability regulation in the cerebral cortex and demonstrate that intact RNA decay machinery is essential for corticogenesis in vivo. We use SLAM-seq to measure RNA half-lives transcriptome-wide across multiple stages of cortical development. Leveraging these data, we discover cis -acting features associated with RNA stability and probe the relationship between RNA half-life and developmental expression changes. Notably, RNAs that are up-regulated across development tend to be more stable, while down-regulated RNAs are less stable. Using compound mouse genetics, we discover CNOT3, a core component of the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex linked to neurodevelopmental disease, is essential for cortical development. Conditional knockout of Cnot3 in neural progenitors and their progeny in the developing mouse cortex leads to severe microcephaly due to altered cell fate and p53-dependent apoptosis. Finally, we define the molecular targets of CNOT3, revealing it controls expression of poorly expressed, non-optimal mRNAs in the cortex, including cell cycle-related transcripts. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that fine-tuned control of RNA turnover is crucial for brain development.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
Codon Optimality Is a Major Determinant of mRNA Stability
Presnyak, V., Alhusaini, N., Chen, Y.-H., Martin, S., Morris, N., Kline, N., Olson, S., Weinberg, D., Baker, K. E., Graveley, B. R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.029 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Thiol-linked alkylation for the metabolic sequencing of RNA
Herzog, V. A., Reichholf, B., Neumann, T., Rescheneder, P., Bhat, P., Burkard, T. R., Wlotzka, W., von Haeseler, A., Zuber, J., & Ameres, S. L. (2017) · doi:10.1101/177642 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Fietz, S. A., Lachmann, R., Brandl, H., Kircher, M., Samusik, N., Schröder, R., Lakshmanaperumal, N., Henry, I., Vogt, J., Riehn, A., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1209647109 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Codon and amino acid content are associated with mRNA stability in mammalian cells
Forrest, M. E., Pinkard, O., Martin, S., Sweet, T. J., Hanson, G., & Coller, J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228730 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Serdar, L. D., Egol, J. R., Lackford, B., Bennett, B. D., Hu, G., & Silver, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Silver, Debra L.
- Venue
- PLOS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2025-02-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e3003031
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- PMC
- PMC11838918
- OpenAlex
- W4407199710
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2025-02-19)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (vor)
- Locations
- PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD107972)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS083897, R01NS120667, R37NS110388, R01NS110388, R21NS128374)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH132089)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01ES102745)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- mRNA stability, RNA turnover, RNA half-life, cortical development, neurogenesis, CNOT3, microcephaly, p53-dependent apoptosis, neural progenitor cells, cell fate specification, cell cycle genes, neurodevelopmental disorders, SLAM-seq
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Microcephaly, RNA, Messenger, Transcription Factors, Apoptosis, Mice, Knockout, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, RNA Stability, Mice, Neurogenesis, Neural Stem Cells, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review