The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Predictions of Peptide Binding to Any HLA-DR Molecule of Known Sequence: NetMHCIIpan
Open accessAbstract
CD4 positive T helper cells control many aspects of specific immunity. These cells are specific for peptides derived from protein antigens and presented by molecules of the extremely polymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II system. The identification of peptides that bind to MHC class II molecules is therefore of pivotal importance for rational discovery of immune epitopes. HLA-DR is a prominent example of a human MHC class II. Here, we present a method, NetMHCIIpan, that allows for pan-specific predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-DR molecule of known sequence. The method is derived from a large compilation of quantitative HLA-DR binding events covering 14 of the more than 500 known HLA-DR alleles. Taking both peptide and HLA sequence information into account, the method can generalize and predict peptide binding also for HLA-DR molecules where experimental data is absent. Validation of the method includes identification of endogenously derived HLA class II ligands, cross-validation, leave-one-molecule-out, and binding motif identification for hitherto uncharacterized HLA-DR molecules. The validation shows that the method can successfully predict binding for HLA-DR molecules-even in the absence of specific data for the particular molecule in question. Moreover, when compared to TEPITOPE, currently the only other publicly available prediction method aiming at providing broad HLA-DR allelic coverage, NetMHCIIpan performs equivalently for alleles included in the training of TEPITOPE while outperforming TEPITOPE on novel alleles. We propose that the method can be used to identify those hitherto uncharacterized alleles, which should be addressed experimentally in future updates of the method to cover the polymorphism of HLA-DR most efficiently. We thus conclude that the presented method meets the challenge of keeping up with the MHC polymorphism discovery rate and that it can be used to sample the MHC "space," enabling a highly efficient iterative process for improving MHC class II binding predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An in silico deep learning approach to multi-epitope vaccine design: a SARS-CoV-2 case study
Yang, Z., Bogdan, P., & Nazarian, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81749-9 · Cited by 271
Pratt, K. P. (2018) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib7020019 · Cited by 96
Artificial Intelligence Technologies for COVID-19 De Novo Drug Design
Floresta, G., Zagni, C., Gentile, D., Patamia, V., & Rescifina, A. (2022) · doi:10.20944/preprints202203.0032.v1 · Cited by 67
Zinsli, L. V., Stierlin, N., Loessner, M. J., & Schmelcher, M. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.024 · Cited by 63
Garzon, T., Ortega-Tirado, D., Lopez-Romero, G., Alday, E., Robles-Zepeda, R. E., Garibay-Escobar, A., & Velazquez, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.769446 · Cited by 14
Haghighatlari, M., Marze, N., Seward, R., Ciarla, A., Hindin, R., Calderini, J., Keenan, B., Dhule, S., Hall-Swan, S., Hickling, T. P., et al. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08500-2 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., Blicher, T., Peters, B., Sette, A., Justesen, S., Buus, S., & Lund, O.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-07-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1000107
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2125644345
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.