Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 480

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hypergraphs and Cellular Networks

Open access
Klamt, Steffen, Haus, Utz-Uwe, Theis, Fabian·2009·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

3,41Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Magdeburg, Germany, 2Institute for Mathematical Optimization, Faculty of Mathematics, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, 3Institute for Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum Mu¨nchen—German Research Center forEnvironmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany, 4Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Go¨ttingen, Germany

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000385

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Klamt, S., Haus, U.-U., & Theis, F.
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2009-05-29
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e1000385
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2083786039
Cited by
480
References
3
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.