The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OptForce: An Optimization Procedure for Identifying All Genetic Manipulations Leading to Targeted Overproductions
Open accessAbstract
Computational procedures for predicting metabolic interventions leading to the overproduction of biochemicals in microbial strains are widely in use. However, these methods rely on surrogate biological objectives (e.g., maximize growth rate or minimize metabolic adjustments) and do not make use of flux measurements often available for the wild-type strain. In this work, we introduce the OptForce procedure that identifies all possible engineering interventions by classifying reactions in the metabolic model depending upon whether their flux values must increase, decrease or become equal to zero to meet a pre-specified overproduction target. We hierarchically apply this classification rule for pairs, triples, quadruples, etc. of reactions. This leads to the identification of a sufficient and non-redundant set of fluxes that must change (i.e., MUST set) to meet a pre-specified overproduction target. Starting with this set we subsequently extract a minimal set of fluxes that must actively be forced through genetic manipulations (i.e., FORCE set) to ensure that all fluxes in the network are consistent with the overproduction objective. We demonstrate our OptForce framework for succinate production in Escherichia coli using the most recent in silico E. coli model, iAF1260. The method not only recapitulates existing engineering strategies but also reveals non-intuitive ones that boost succinate production by performing coordinated changes on pathways distant from the last steps of succinate synthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models
Mahadevan, R., & Schilling, C. H. (2003) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2003.09.002 · Cited by 1,203
Metabolic modelling of microbes: the flux‐balance approach
Edwards, J. S., Covert, M., & Palsson, B. (2002) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00282.x · Cited by 365
Cited by
Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0
Heirendt, L., Arreckx, S., Pfau, T., Mendoza, S. N., Richelle, A., Heinken, A., Haraldsdóttir, H. S., Wachowiak, J., Keating, S. M., Vlasov, V., et al. (2019) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0098-2 · Cited by 1,242
Self-citationMetabolic Burden: Cornerstones in Synthetic Biology and Metabolic Engineering Applications
Wu, G., Yan, Q., Jones, J. A., Tang, Y. J., Fong, S. S., & Koffas, M. A. G. (2016) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.010 · Cited by 666
New applications of synthetic biology tools for cyanobacterial metabolic engineering
Santos-Merino, M., Singh, A. K., & Ducat, D. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00033 · Cited by 222
Khodayari, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13806 · Cited by 230
Self-citationZea mays iRS1563: A Comprehensive Genome-Scale Metabolic Reconstruction of Maize Metabolism
Saha, R., Suthers, P. F., & Maranas, C. D. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021784 · Cited by 201
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranganathan, S., Suthers, P. F., & Maranas, C. D.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-04-15
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1000744
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W1987607959
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OptForce: An Optimization Procedure for Identifying All Genetic Manipulations Leading to Targeted Overproductions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000744
- The paper
- Ranganathan, S., Suthers, P. F., & Maranas, C. D. (2010). OptForce: An Optimization Procedure for Identifying All Genetic Manipulations Leading to Targeted Overproductions. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.