The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avalanches in a Stochastic Model of Spiking Neurons
Open accessAbstract
Neuronal avalanches are a form of spontaneous activity widely observed in cortical slices and other types of nervous tissue, both in vivo and in vitro. They are characterized by irregular, isolated population bursts when many neurons fire together, where the number of spikes per burst obeys a power law distribution. We simulate, using the Gillespie algorithm, a model of neuronal avalanches based on stochastic single neurons. The network consists of excitatory and inhibitory neurons, first with all-to-all connectivity and later with random sparse connectivity. Analyzing our model using the system size expansion, we show that the model obeys the standard Wilson-Cowan equations for large network sizes ( neurons). When excitation and inhibition are closely balanced, networks of thousands of neurons exhibit irregular synchronous activity, including the characteristic power law distribution of avalanche size. We show that these avalanches are due to the balanced network having weakly stable functionally feedforward dynamics, which amplifies some small fluctuations into the large population bursts. Balanced networks are thought to underlie a variety of observed network behaviours and have useful computational properties, such as responding quickly to changes in input. Thus, the appearance of avalanches in such functionally feedforward networks indicates that avalanches may be a simple consequence of a widely present network structure, when neuron dynamics are noisy. An important implication is that a network need not be "critical" for the production of avalanches, so experimentally observed power laws in burst size may be a signature of noisy functionally feedforward structure rather than of, for example, self-organized criticality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
On the dynamics of the spontaneous activity in neuronal networks
Mazzoni, A., Broccard, F. D., Garcia-Perez, E., Bonifazi, P., Ruaro, M. E., & Torre, V. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000439 · Cited by 279
Systematic Fluctuation Expansion for Neural Network Activity Equations
Buice, M. A., Cowan, J. D., & Chow, C. C. (2010) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2009.02-09-960 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
Cited by
Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
Delorme, A., Palmer, J., Onton, J., Oostenveld, R., & Makeig, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030135 · Cited by 810
Being Critical of Criticality in the Brain
Beggs, J. M., & Timme, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00163 · Cited by 494
Self-organized criticality as a fundamental property of neural systems
Hesse, J., & Gross, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00166 · Cited by 440
Power-law statistics and universal scaling in the absence of criticality
Touboul, J., & Destexhe, A. (2017) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.95.012413 · Cited by 210
Critical branching neural networks.
Kello, C. T. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030970 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Benayoun, M., Cowan, J. D., van Drongelen, W., & Wallace, E.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-07-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1000846
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2073937499
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avalanches in a Stochastic Model of Spiking Neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000846
- The paper
- Benayoun, M., Cowan, J. D., van Drongelen, W., & Wallace, E. (2010). Avalanches in a Stochastic Model of Spiking Neurons. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.