deFuse: An Algorithm for Gene Fusion Discovery in Tumor RNA-Seq Data
Open accessAbstract
Gene fusions created by somatic genomic rearrangements are known to play an important role in the onset and development of some cancers, such as lymphomas and sarcomas. RNA-Seq (whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing) is proving to be a useful tool for the discovery of novel gene fusions in cancer transcriptomes. However, algorithmic methods for the discovery of gene fusions using RNA-Seq data remain underdeveloped. We have developed deFuse, a novel computational method for fusion discovery in tumor RNA-Seq data. Unlike existing methods that use only unique best-hit alignments and consider only fusion boundaries at the ends of known exons, deFuse considers all alignments and all possible locations for fusion boundaries. As a result, deFuse is able to identify fusion sequences with demonstrably better sensitivity than previous approaches. To increase the specificity of our approach, we curated a list of 60 true positive and 61 true negative fusion sequences (as confirmed by RT-PCR), and have trained an adaboost classifier on 11 novel features of the sequence data. The resulting classifier has an estimated value of 0.91 for the area under the ROC curve. We have used deFuse to discover gene fusions in 40 ovarian tumor samples, one ovarian cancer cell line, and three sarcoma samples. We report herein the first gene fusions discovered in ovarian cancer. We conclude that gene fusions are not infrequent events in ovarian cancer and that these events have the potential to substantially alter the expression patterns of the genes involved; gene fusions should therefore be considered in efforts to comprehensively characterize the mutational profiles of ovarian cancer transcriptomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Removing all fusions involving an IG gene may remove real IG fusions in lymphomas and other blood disorders.
“For example, removing all fusions involving an IG gene may remove real IG fusions in lymphomas and other blood disorders; filtering fusions for which both genes are from the IG locus is preferred [88].”
From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [88]
Expected variation includes immunoglobulin (IG) rearrangements in tumor samples infiltrated by immune cells, transiently expressed transposons and nuclear mitochondrial DNA, and read-through chimeras produced by co-transcription of adjacent genes.
“Examples of expected variation include immunoglobulin (IG) rearrangements in tumor samples infiltrated by immune cells, transiently expressed transposons and nuclear mitochondrial DNA, and read-through chimeras produced by co-transcription of adjacent genes [88].”
From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [88]
The combination of RNA-seq and re-sequencing can be used both to remove false positives when inferring fusion genes and to analyze copy number alterations.
“Moreover, the combination of RNA-seq and re-sequencing can be used both to remove false positives when inferring fusion genes [88] and to analyze copy number alterations [137].”
From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 557
- Authors
- McPherson, A., Hormozdiari, F., Zayed, A., Giuliany, R., Ha, G., Sun, M. G. F., Griffith, M., Heravi Moussavi, A., Senz, J., Melnyk, N., Pacheco, M., Marra, M. A., Hirst, M., Nielsen, T. O., Sahinalp, S. C., Huntsman, D., & Shah, S. P.
- Affiliations
- BC Cancer Agency (CA)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Shah, Sohrab P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-05-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e1001138
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC3098195
- OpenAlex
- W2029623390
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 16.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Summit (Simon Fraser University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Genome Canada
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
- Michael Smith Health Research BC
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Keywords
- AdaBoost classifier, ovarian cancer, sarcoma, lymphoma, tumor transcriptome
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Base Sequence, Carcinoma, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Sarcoma, Skin Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Cell Line, Tumor, Oncogene Fusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review