The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wikipedia Usage Estimates Prevalence of Influenza-Like Illness in the United States in Near Real-Time
Open accessAbstract
Circulating levels of both seasonal and pandemic influenza require constant surveillance to ensure the health and safety of the population. While up-to-date information is critical, traditional surveillance systems can have data availability lags of up to two weeks. We introduce a novel method of estimating, in near-real time, the level of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the United States (US) by monitoring the rate of particular Wikipedia article views on a daily basis. We calculated the number of times certain influenza- or health-related Wikipedia articles were accessed each day between December 2007 and August 2013 and compared these data to official ILI activity levels provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We developed a Poisson model that accurately estimates the level of ILI activity in the American population, up to two weeks ahead of the CDC, with an absolute average difference between the two estimates of just 0.27% over 294 weeks of data. Wikipedia-derived ILI models performed well through both abnormally high media coverage events (such as during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic) as well as unusually severe influenza seasons (such as the 2012-2013 influenza season). Wikipedia usage accurately estimated the week of peak ILI activity 17% more often than Google Flu Trends data and was often more accurate in its measure of ILI intensity. With further study, this method could potentially be implemented for continuous monitoring of ILI activity in the US and to provide support for traditional influenza surveillance tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eysenbach, G. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1157 · Cited by 1,351
Cook, S., Conrad, C., Fowlkes, A. L., & Mohebbi, M. H. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023610 · Cited by 381
Olson, D. R., Konty, K. J., Paladini, M., Viboud, C., & Simonsen, L. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003256 · Cited by 320
Cited by
Statistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
Combining Search, Social Media, and Traditional Data Sources to Improve Influenza Surveillance
Santillana, M., Nguyen, A. T., Dredze, M., Paul, M. J., Nsoesie, E. O., & Brownstein, J. S. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004513 · Cited by 420
Self-citationVirtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial.
Anderson, P. L., Price, M., Edwards, S. M., Obasaju, M. A., Schmertz, S. K., Zimand, E., & Calamaras, M. R. (2013) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033559 · Cited by 371
Jia, Q., Guo, Y., Wang, G., & Barnes, S. J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17176161 · Cited by 117
Volkova, S., Ayton, E., Porterfield, K., & Corley, C. D. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188941 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- McIver, D. J., & Brownstein, J. S.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-04-17
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1003581
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2070272165
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wikipedia Usage Estimates Prevalence of Influenza-Like Illness in the United States in Near Real-Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003581
- The paper
- McIver, D. J., & Brownstein, J. S. (2014). Wikipedia Usage Estimates Prevalence of Influenza-Like Illness in the United States in Near Real-Time. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.